My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/03/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/03/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:37:52 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:37:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />Councilmember Gunn wondered if the signs would want to be higher rather than lower. <br />Councilmember Thomas responded no because the higher it gets, it causes light pollution and is <br />disrespectful to residents. <br />AMENDMENT MOTION: THOMAS/MARTY. To amend Chapter 1008 of the Municipal <br />Code Relating to Signs and Billboards, to allow a maximum billboard height of 35 feet on Old <br />Highway 8. <br />Director Ericson stated he would take the Ordinance back and check the map to see how much it <br />would impact the sites if it was changed to reflect a 500 foot setback for residential zoned <br />property. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated it would be only for the 45 foot height limitation. <br />Mayor Marty stated depending on where the location of the sign is, a variance could be <br />requested. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that one of the problems is the relocation of billboards and where <br />to put them, and that a certain height is required for the billboards to be visible in some locations. <br />He stated this issue was already discussed, and the certain locations that require a height of 45 <br />feet have been designated. He stated he does not support the amendment. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated Old Highway 8 was not part of that discussion. <br />Mayor Marty stated there are residents living in that area, and the height requirement could be 35 <br />feet, and a variance could be requested for signs on Old Highway 8. He stated the City would <br />look at it if it is a hardship and if it does not infringe on the citizens, it would not be a big deal. <br />He stated for the protection of the residents, he supports an amendment of the height requirement <br />of 35 feet on Old Highway 8. <br />Councilmember Gunn asked Rich Sonterre, representative for Clear Channel Outdoors, if they <br />were putting billboards along Old Highway 8, would they be put on the I-35W side by I-35W or <br />on the business side. She asked who would see the billboards if they were on the business side. <br />Mr. Sonterre, stated that all of the property between Old Highway 8 and the MnDOT fence line is <br />public held land and does not allow for construction. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked Mr. Sonterre if there would be a problem with having a height <br />requirement of 35 foot and requesting a variance for any heights necessary above that. <br />Mr. Sonterre stated that Clear Channel prefers to have a single common voice with Tom <br />McCarver on all policy matters and negotiations with the City. He stated he prefers to have Mr. <br />McCarver speak on this question. He stated if an evaluation was done of the locations that exist <br />and look at the obstacles that would be a hindrance to visibility rights, it would be assumed that a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.