Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />Councilmember Gunn wondered if the signs would want to be higher rather than lower. <br />Councilmember Thomas responded no because the higher it gets, it causes light pollution and is <br />disrespectful to residents. <br />AMENDMENT MOTION: THOMAS/MARTY. To amend Chapter 1008 of the Municipal <br />Code Relating to Signs and Billboards, to allow a maximum billboard height of 35 feet on Old <br />Highway 8. <br />Director Ericson stated he would take the Ordinance back and check the map to see how much it <br />would impact the sites if it was changed to reflect a 500 foot setback for residential zoned <br />property. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated it would be only for the 45 foot height limitation. <br />Mayor Marty stated depending on where the location of the sign is, a variance could be <br />requested. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that one of the problems is the relocation of billboards and where <br />to put them, and that a certain height is required for the billboards to be visible in some locations. <br />He stated this issue was already discussed, and the certain locations that require a height of 45 <br />feet have been designated. He stated he does not support the amendment. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated Old Highway 8 was not part of that discussion. <br />Mayor Marty stated there are residents living in that area, and the height requirement could be 35 <br />feet, and a variance could be requested for signs on Old Highway 8. He stated the City would <br />look at it if it is a hardship and if it does not infringe on the citizens, it would not be a big deal. <br />He stated for the protection of the residents, he supports an amendment of the height requirement <br />of 35 feet on Old Highway 8. <br />Councilmember Gunn asked Rich Sonterre, representative for Clear Channel Outdoors, if they <br />were putting billboards along Old Highway 8, would they be put on the I-35W side by I-35W or <br />on the business side. She asked who would see the billboards if they were on the business side. <br />Mr. Sonterre, stated that all of the property between Old Highway 8 and the MnDOT fence line is <br />public held land and does not allow for construction. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked Mr. Sonterre if there would be a problem with having a height <br />requirement of 35 foot and requesting a variance for any heights necessary above that. <br />Mr. Sonterre stated that Clear Channel prefers to have a single common voice with Tom <br />McCarver on all policy matters and negotiations with the City. He stated he prefers to have Mr. <br />McCarver speak on this question. He stated if an evaluation was done of the locations that exist <br />and look at the obstacles that would be a hindrance to visibility rights, it would be assumed that a <br />