Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 35 <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Stigney wondered how a resident can answer the question if the impact of the <br />funding mechanism is not discussed. He stated the current policy says the neighborhood is asked <br />how it wants it reconstructed. <br /> <br />City Administrator stated that last year when this question was adopted, the City was in a <br />different place with the street improvement plan. He suggested there is less of a need to ask a <br />street question. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thomas stated that it is a decent question because it encourages residents to take <br />part in the process, but she does not want it to get too complicated. <br /> <br />The Council, with the exception of Councilmember Stigney, agreed to leave the question as <br />stated. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that the eighth question does not indicate what the funding source <br />is. <br /> <br />Mayor Marty suggested this question should be removed because the second option is not an <br />option anymore. <br /> <br />Councilmember suggested that the second option should read that no changes are needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that it does not define the fitness center that is being considered. <br />He asked if the question can be pulled. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thomas stated this question might be difficult to work out right now with the <br />current situation. <br /> <br />The Council agreed to remove the question. <br /> <br />Mayor Marty stated that Staff made good choices on the questions that will be asked. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the church indicated that April would be the last month that <br />they would be occupying the building. He noted the City will be sending a final invoice for <br />services and space. He noted they were paying $1,500 per month to Canyon Grill for the space <br />they were occupying, so this will be empty space. <br /> <br />Mayor Marty asked if they have a contract with Canyon Grill. City Administrator Ulrich stated it <br />appears to be a 30 day contract, and City Attorney Riggs is reviewing. <br /> <br />City Attorney Riggs stated there is a 180 day notice provision in the lease, but it is not there any <br />more. He stated that they appear to be on a 30 day term at this point, although the City is the <br />successor under the lease. He noted Staff will resolve that and send a notice to clarify what is <br />going on.