My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/05/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/05/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:45:19 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:45:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
5/22/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 29 <br />• former City Administrator Chuck Whiting to do anything and asked what they told Chief <br />Ramacher. <br />City Attorney Alsop stated from what he was told, the former Mayor was more directly involved. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated the former Mayor had no authority to be involved. <br />City Attorney Alsop explained that based on what the former City Administrator said and the <br />public record; there is no indication that Mr. Ramacher was offered a lump sum or premium <br />payout. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked whether he got a statement from the former City Administrator <br />that he did not make that offer. City Attorney Alsop stated he cannot prove something that did <br />not happen. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated he wants to receive that statement from former City Administrator <br />Whiting and the Assistant City Administrator. City Attorney Alsop stated the Assistant City <br />Administrator said she has no recollection. <br />Mayor Marty stated the Council said Mr. Ramacher had no option. Councilmember Stigney <br />asked where is the video tape or the meeting minutes that state that. <br />City Attorney Alsop stated he talked to all Councilmembers and all said they have no <br />• recollection. He stated it is clear that an option was not offered to former Police Chief Ramacher <br />and the resolution itself indicated what he was going to get. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked again for a statement from former City Administrator Chuck <br />Whiting saying he offered no option to Chief Ramacher. He noted this would protect the City. <br />Councilmember Thomas recommended that the City Attorney's office be authorized to proceed <br />to fix this issue. <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GiJNN. To direct the City staff to work with the City Attorney <br />to resolve the tax issue. <br />AMENDMENT MOTION: STIGNEY/ To direct the City Attorney to obtain a written statement <br />from former City Administrator Chuck Whiting that he did not offer former Police Chief <br />Ramacher any option. <br />Amendment motion died for lack of a second. <br />Councilmember Stigney restated his support to protect the City by obtaining a written statement <br />from former City Administrator Chuck Whiting. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.