My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/07/10 (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/07/10 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:46:29 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:46:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 10, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />C7 <br />• <br />Acting Mayor Stigney stated he agreed with the Planning Commission's decision that the <br />billboard would affect the adjoining property in a detrimental way. He stated the property owner <br />is creating the hardship by not relocating the billboard. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated that, looking at the rendering of the billboard, it looks to her like at <br />either height, and the billboard would not obstruct the adjoining building. She stated she does <br />not see the total obstruction or depreciation that would take place. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated she agrees with Councilmember Thomas that the issue is that the <br />billboards have to be moved somewhere and the spot in question is one that the Council <br />determined was acceptable. She stated the Council had to work in a "good faith" initiative to <br />move the billboards. She stated the Council was not happy about the billboard on Highway 10, <br />but agreed the spot in question would be the least intrusive. She stated she does not support the <br />denial of the NP. <br />Mayor Marty arrived at 7:44 p.m. and chaired the remainder of the meeting. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated, regarding the depreciation, that if Mr. Hall decided to plant a <br />tree, not a single person at the table would claim the neighboring property would be depreciated <br />because visibility was blocked. She added that to claim depreciation is caused by one thing or <br />another is amake-believe reason to justify not approving the billboard. She stated she does not <br />see any way the IUP violates code. <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/MARTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6875 <br />denying an Interim Use Permit for a Billboard at 2200 County Road 10. <br />Ayes - 2 Nays - 3 (Thomas, Flaherty, Gunn) Motion failed. <br />Councilmember Thomas asked Staff to bring back a resolution for approval of the IUP and <br />addressing the height variance to the next meeting. <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/FLAHERTY. To direct staff to prepare a resolution approving <br />the Interim Use Permit for a Billboard at 2200 County Road 10 that addresses the height limit for <br />consideration at the next meeting. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />B. 7:10 pm Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution 6876 Approving an <br />Interim Use Permit (IUP) for a Billboard at 5201 Program Avenue <br />• <br />Director Ericson stated this discussion is similar to the last one. He explained where the <br />billboard would be located and that it was one of the sites the City identified as a potential site <br />for a relocated billboard. <br />Director Ericson stated the Planning Commission considered potential for adverse effects at the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.