Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty explained that the ordinance was discussed and that the Council decided explicitly <br />to limit height. He stated he does not feel billboards belong on County Road 10 and the <br />Council decided if a billboard would be approved at the site, it would be limited to 35 feet. <br />Mayor Marty expressed his concern about the precedent that would be set if a 45-foot billboard <br />was allowed. He stated he is concerned about allowing a variance from the code without a <br />hardship and the implications on other City ordinances and with other billboards. <br />Councilmember Thomas expressed her favor of Option B, approving the IUP but denying the <br />variance. <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6875 <br />pertaining to an Interim Use Permit (IUP) Application for a Billboard at 2200 County Road 10. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 2 (Stigney, Marty) Motion carried. <br />D 7:20 pm -Public Hearing to Consider the Appeal of a Variance Denial for a <br />45 Foot Tall Billboard at 2200 County Road 10 <br />MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6893, <br />denying Appeal of a Variance Denial fora 45 Foot Tall Billboard at 2200 County Road 10. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />F. 7:25 pm -Public Hearing and Consideration of a consideration of a <br />Preliminary Plat for a Major Subdivision of 8360 Long Lake Road; Planning <br />Case MA2006-002 <br />Planning Associate Heller explained that the property is just over 1.5 acres and the property <br />owner has submitted a request to divide it into three lots. She stated that the current home would <br />be demolished. She stated that the current zoning will support the subdivision and the proposed <br />lots will each be one-half acre. <br />Planning Associate Heller stated it is consistent with zoning and the Comprehensive Plan, and <br />the Staff reports the watershed district will be contacted. She stated that easement has been <br />dedicated in the preliminary plat and Long Lake Road is large enough to handle the additional <br />traffic. <br />Planning Associate Heller explained that there will be park dedication requirements and Staff <br />recommends it be based ontwo-thirds the land value. She stated that sewer and water are <br />accessible. <br />Planning Associate Helier indicated that much of the lot is tree-covered. She stated one resident <br />to the rear of the property was concerned about the number of trees being cleared. She noted that <br />