My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/07/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/07/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/24/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6889 <br />Awarding a Construction Contract for the Medtronic Utility Extension Project. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />I. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 778, an Ordinance Rezoning <br />the Properties Located at 2901 and 2925 County Road 10 and the Back Half <br />of 8060 Groveland Road to R-3, Medium Density Residential, in Support of <br />Integra Homes Request. <br />Director Ericson explained that this item has been before the Council and Planning Commission <br />several times. He reminded the City of the discussion and of the planned development for the <br />area. He stated the plan is within the Comprehensive Plan designation of mixed-use, but that the <br />Planning Commission had issues with what should be the use for this area. <br />Director Ericson stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of the preliminary <br />plat. He noted that the developer considered the Planning Commission and residents' comments <br />and brought forward a new plan that took into consideration the comments and concerns. <br />Director Ericson stated that this is a simple re-zoning, not a preliminary plat. He stated the <br />Planning Commission still has questions about whether this is the correct development for the <br />• area and concerns with the density. <br />Director Ericson explained that the proposal is for 19 owner-occupied townhome units. He <br />stated the developer submitted an elevation with proposed units. He stated they would be <br />designed with decks on the back and concrete drives. He stated it is a nice development if <br />townhomes are determined to be the best use. <br />Director Ericson noted some of the feedback involved privacy issues, highest and best use for the <br />area, and that many adjacent residents felt that the properly should be office or retail. Director <br />Ericson stated the mixed-use comprehensive plan provides for some flexibility, but that it is up to <br />the City to determine what is the best use for the property. He stated there was not a clear <br />distinction about what the best land use should be for the property. <br />Director Ericson stated the Planning Commission recommended that the City deny the re-zoning <br />because the townhomes did not adhere with what they believe should be in this area. He stated <br />that during the work session, two of three Councilmembers indicated that they like the <br />townhomes. He stated there are two options for action: approve or deny the re-zoning. <br />Director Ericson stated that the ordinance could be given a first reading and Staff could hold off <br />the second reading so the Council could go through the preliminary planning, and then approve <br />or deny the development. <br />Director Ericson stated Staff recommends giving first reading, but wait for the second reading to <br />allow Integra to submit a major subdivision and plan. He noted that this is not a published public <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.