My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/07/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/07/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/24/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br />• traffic more than the townhomes would. He stated that Integra owns the property and they do not <br />have the option of the PUD. Councilmember Stigney stated he agrees with the re-zoning. <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/GUNN. To waive the reading and accept first reading and <br />Introduction of Ordinance 778, an Ordinance Rezoning the Properties Located at 2901 and 2925 <br />County Road 10 and the Back Half of 8060 Groveland Road to R-3, Medium Density <br />Residential, in Support of Integra Homes Request. <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated that the area is already zoned for a business, and asked "if not <br />townhomes, then what." He brought up the example of a gas station or liquor store and asked <br />what the residents would prefer. He stated that he does not believe a commercial business will <br />increase the property value of the homes in the area as much as townhomes. He stated he would <br />like to see if there is a workable solution with more feedback. He stated he is stuck because he <br />does not know what else residents would like. <br />Councilmember Gunn stated it comes down to the people who own the property and that they can <br />develop it they way they see fit. She stated the property owners could sell the land to a less <br />desirable entity. <br />Mr. Waldoch restated his concern. <br />. Director Ericson stated the properties have a designated zoning, and tomorrow the land could be <br />developed as long as the zoning was consistent. He stated that any business could go in that area <br />that is consistent with the zoning of the property. He stated that the property can be developed, <br />as it sits presently, with its business zoning. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she understands the request. She stated it is almost an arbitrary <br />decision, but at some point, the Council will make the call about the best use of the property. She <br />stated that the Council needs to make the decision if townhomes are the best use of the property. <br />She stated at some point, the discussions will continue until the Council makes a decision. She <br />stated that the Council either needs to make a decision, or request a market study to determine <br />the best use. <br />Mayor Marty stated his concern is that residents have not been notified. Director Ericson <br />explained that he has made every effort to notify residents of what is going on. Mayor Marty <br />stated that the property owners he spoke to expressed a desire to keep the 7 acres as one unit in <br />the PUD. He stated that the property owners outside of the proposed project would be willing to <br />sell. <br />Mayor Marty voiced his concern that taking the property out of the middle makes it unfeasible to <br />develop the 7 acres as one unit. Mayor Marty stated he would not like to see the property broken <br />up in the middle. Mayor Marty stated that Economic Development Coordinator Backman gave <br />the City a "heads up" about anassisted-living home. <br />• Mayor Marty stated the proposed townhomes would increase the market value of the properly to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.