My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/07/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/07/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:46:48 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/24/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 24, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked about the spike in 1999 with the operation expenses related to the <br />water fund on page 10. Mayor Marty stated he does not recall why there was the spike. <br />Councilmember Flaherty pointed out it went from $700K to nearly $1 million. <br />Director Lee stated it was awater-meter change-out program. <br />MOTION/SECOND: GLTNN/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6868 <br />Accepting the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />A. 7:05 pm -Public Hearing to Consider the First Reading and Introduction of <br />Ordinance 776, an Ordinance adopting the Five Year Financial Plan. <br />Finance Director Beer stated at the last work session the 5-year financial plan was presented for <br />review and discussion. He recommended opening the public hearing. <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. <br />Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, commented that it bothered him to hear that there is a shift <br />of the revenue source toward property taxes as reported in the budget report. He stated that even <br />if the shift is the same as what is happening in other Cities, the shift should concern residents. <br />Mayor Many responded that it is due basically to the reduction and elimination of LGA, Local <br />Government Assistance. He stated the City used to receive close to $1 a year in LGA and when <br />that was cut there were the same expenses in the City. He stated in order to keep the City <br />running, they had to raise taxes. He stated the state property taxes were cut, but the City had to <br />raise taxes in order to keep the City running. He noted the shift from the State funding to City <br />funding. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the point in the report was a shift to property taxes from the City <br />doing business. She stated the City has stopped doing business and that is the reason for the <br />shift. She stated the major reason was the sale of the Golf Course. <br />Mr. Glidden stated the City has very few other sources of income. He asked if there will be <br />increases or decreases to the assumptions about estimated market and assessed property value. <br />Finance Director Beer stated assessed values are not considered, but that there is a 3% levy <br />increase estimate. <br />Mr. Glidden asked about the overall increase in expenditures. Mayor Marty replied that the <br />Council's goal is to have a 0% increase. Finance Director Beer stated that for 2007, he <br />calculated 0%, but for the subsequent years he factored 3%. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.