My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/09/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/09/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:47:56 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:47:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/25/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 25, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 21 <br />City Attorney Riggs explained that in essence, there is a provision in the Charter that went into <br />effect in 1979 for which there was no authorization. He stated absent of the authority, there needs <br />to be a re-adoption of the provision. <br />Mayor Marty stated that for the City Charter to mean what it says, that part of the Charter needs <br />to be re-approved or re-authorized. City Attorney Riggs suggested it be re-approved and <br />clarified. He stated that the office is appointed by a district judge, not by the City. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated he could understand the argument both ways and that there is a lot of <br />latitude and should be clarified. He stated one option is for the City to refer this matter to the <br />Charter Commission for their recommendation. <br />Mayor Marty stated he did not know about the 2004 change until the issue was brought to his <br />attention. He stated the Charter needs to be referred back to the Commission for clarification. <br />Councilmember Flaherty commented that particularly because a ruling was not made, the <br />Council is back to square one. City Attorney Riggs replied that it does not stop future lawsuits. <br />He stated there have been numerous occasions when Councilmembers have also been Charter <br />Commission members. He said it has been acknowledged that that language does not apply over <br />the 27-year history. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if the issue was being forwarded to the Charter Commission for <br />review, but asked if the Commission discussed it. City Attorney Riggs explained that the judge <br />asked for a response and that the issue was never brought up in the Commission. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if it is the Attorney's intention to forward something to the <br />Charter Commission. City Attorney Riggs suggested everything be forwarded to the Charter <br />Commission for review. He recommended starting with the Charter Commission, which could <br />then make a recommendation to the Council. <br />MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. To have City Attorney Riggs submit information <br />to the Charter Commission for review and to authorize follow-up action for any filings that need <br />to be completed. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/GLJNN. To cancel holding an executive session. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />12. Nezt Council Work Session: Monday, October 2, 2006, at 7 p.m. <br />Nezt Council Meeting: Monday, October 9, 2006, at 7 p.m. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.