My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/11/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/11/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:49:02 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:49:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/13/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 13, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />Director Ericson indicated that, if approved, from January 1, 2007 forward every document <br />would be archived into the system for future use. <br />Council Member Flaherty said that it states that Roseville has made a significant expense in the <br />software and Mounds View will pay maintenance fees and he would like to know what the <br />maintenance fee would be. <br />Director Ericson indicated it would be approximately $700 to $800 annually and noted that the <br />software cost was around $75,000 to Roseville so the cost for the City to take part is the <br />hardware and scanning costs and creating an index for those documents. <br />Council Member Flaherty asked whether the personnel hours are included in the estimate. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Mounds View Staff will do the scanning from January 1 going <br />forward and they will undertake the scanning of the documents prior to that. <br />Council Member Flaherty asked what microfilm looks like and asked whether it is necessary to <br />switch from microfilm to digital media. <br />Director Ericson indicated that it is not critical but it may be necessary if the City wants all <br />documentation to be searchable in the same location. He then said that it is possible that the <br />second year costs could be less if the City decides to maintain the microfilm reader but it is <br />already getting harder to read the existing microfilm. <br />Council Member Flaherty indicated the City needs to do this but he is looking at it for ways to <br />save money. <br />Council Member Thomas agreed with going ahead with the two year implementation because <br />that will assist with the goal of increasing communication with residents. She then said that she <br />would like to suggest that Staff stay on top of technology moving forward to do handwritten <br />notes and keep in mind whether the City needs to keep those types of things for the future. <br />Council Member Gunn said that she feels that everything should be done because it would be <br />difficult if one piece you were looking for was on microfilm. She then asked if there is the <br />ability for an adjoining City to share documents by email. <br />Director Ericson indicated that is possible. <br />Finance Director Beer indicated that the microfilm is the only copy of some documents and some <br />of them are beginning to degrade so the sooner the City gets them converted the better. <br />Mayor Marty indicated that he has spent days going through boxes of information to locate files <br />on specific topics. He then said that there is the possibility for people to take documents from <br />the files but, if it is electronically preserved, it will always be available to Staff and residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.