My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/11/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/11/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:50:10 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:49:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that the Code requires that the tower be available for multiple <br />uses and this proposal is not. He then said that the code requirements should be resolved prior to <br />asking for a location. <br />Director Ericson said his question would be whether Council supports this or not before TMobile <br />goes through the CUP process. <br />Carol Mueller, council member Elect, of 8343 Groveland Road asked Council not to put a <br />lightning rod in their community park or any community park. She then said that doing so would <br />be a safety hazard and she does not feel that the funding that the tower may provide would be <br />worth the safety risk. <br />Council Member Gunn agreed and said that this would open the door to others coming in. <br />Council Member Flaherty indicated he was not big on putting it in the park but it would interest <br />him to look further at the Arden area. He then said that putting it into a park setting may create a <br />safety issue but he would consider looking at Arden Park. <br />Public Works Director Lee said that TMobile said it would not work at Arden Park. <br />Mayor Many indicated that he is not in favor of this because the parks are valuable to residents <br />and other communities are trying to buy property for green space and this City seems to be <br />selling it off so he is not interested. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that TMobile would like to present plans to the Council for <br />consideration. <br />Mayor Marty indicated that he is not interested in commercializing the City's parks. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that the proposal has changed based on Park Commission <br />comments and they plan to incorporate this with the existing park building with the same block <br />structure attached to the park building. <br />Council Member Stigney said that would raise insurance questions but his first question goes <br />back to whether this is single use towers or multiple use towers and until that is addressed he <br />does not think it should move any further. He then said that if it goes there that is MV property <br />and it should go to the general fund not just to Parks. He further said he has overriding issues of <br />multiple towers throughout the City and the planning committee should look at that. <br />Park and Recreation Commission Member, Cindy Palm, of 2266 Terrace Drive said that she is <br />not in favor of this because of precedent that this may set. She then said that since the <br />Commission met there was a new proposal from TMobile and it was 10 x 12 and now it is 12 x <br />15 and then in a different location as a 12x 10 and now it is a 12x20 structure right behind the <br />• Groveland building. She further said that Park Commissioners wanted to make sure that when <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.