My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/06/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/06/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 2:06:13 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/26/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />intent is. She said if the decision is made to go in a different direction, they need to determine <br />what direction to go. <br />Mayor Marty said he believes the EDC could look it over and discuss what the best use might be. <br />He said the Planning Commission denied the town home development, and should consider what <br />the best use of the property is. He said the EDC, Planning Commission, City Council, and Staff <br />should discuss what the best use for the area would be. <br />Mr. Brouassa addressed "if not this, then what," question and replied it is his thought that <br />perhaps the Planning Commission was listening to the residents and reacting to comments <br />desiring a commercial building. He said residents would like something commercial and that he <br />tried to explain that they did try to meet with other property owners and a consolidation was not <br />possible. He said an effort was made to consolidate the parcels, but it could not happen, and a <br />commercial building in this area would be very difficult. <br />Mr. Brouassa said that in the Staff Report, the question is asked if the development follows the <br />Comprehensive Plan. He said he believes it does follow the Comprehensive Plan because it <br />allows for linkages for other developments. He said there was no intention to go for a PUD with <br />this submittal, and brought up the points that they were trying to work within the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />Councilmember Stigney said that large retail will not go in to such an area. He said another gas <br />station could go in, another drugstore, or something else that is more undesirable. IIe said he <br />does not believe office buildings will work and asked what other possible options existed. He <br />said if Integra could come up with a good plan, he would consider it. <br />Ms. Meyer said that traffic flow needs to be considered. Councilmember Stigney replied that <br />anything built in the area will affect traffic flow. <br />Ms. Dewing asked if the Council has to approve anything that will be built in the area. <br />Councilmember Gunn and Councilmember "Thomas replied that if it meets the appropriate <br />zoning code, the Council has no say about what goes in. <br />Mayor Marty said the Council cannot deny a business or homeowner unless there is a very good <br />reason. He explained that if a business complies with all City rules and codes, the Council <br />cannot deny it. <br />Ms. Dewing said that the developers have not been talking to her or her neighbors, because she <br />has not been approached by the developers. She said if she were approached, she would be more <br />involved. <br />Councilmember Thomas replied that the discussions to which Mr. Brouassa was referring were <br />probably between people who owned property the developers hoped to purchase, not with <br />neighbors away from the development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.