Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />is the Council's ability and responsibility to maintain neighborly relations and the code should <br />help encourage friendly neighborly relations. <br />Councilmember Stigney replied that decks do require railings, and using the same analogy <br />toward retaining walls will require too many things. Mr. Amundsen said his point is that the <br />Council does legislate safety issues. <br />Mayor Marty said he would like to table the discussion and have Community Development <br />Director Ericson, City Attorney Riggs, and the Planning Commission take another look at the <br />code. <br />Councilmember Thomas said sending this to the Planning Commission is too much, that Staff <br />should be able to complete changes. Councilmember Gunn said she likes Councilmember <br />Thomas' suggested amendment. <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/MARTY. To postpone action on the Adoption of <br />Ordinance 773, an Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code Relating to Landscaping, Fences <br />and Retaining Walls, until the July 24, 2006 meeting <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked if July 10 would allow enough time, Community Development <br />Director Ericson responded the last meeting in July will be sufficient. <br />Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />B. Public Hearing to Consider a Rezoning Request Submitted by Integra Homes <br />Relating to the Properties at 2901 and 2925 County Road 10 and the West <br />Half of 8060 Groveland Road to R-3, Medium Density Residential <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained to the Council that Ron <br />Lillestrand requests approval of re -zoning for the site of a proposed townhome <br />development. He stated the development originally entailed 21 town home units and <br />that the Planning Commission recommended denial of the request based on several <br />factors, including density, privacy issues, an impact on adjoining properties, and lack of <br />guest parking. <br />Director Ericson stated that the developers have re -submitted a re -development application for a <br />simple re -zoning request. He stated the developers have reduced the density to 19 units, <br />reconfigured the layout of the town homes, added guest parking, and changed the width and <br />internal configuration of the driveways. <br />Director Ericson explained the Planning Commission had difficulty with the application because <br />they questioned if it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the County Road 10 <br />corridor and the City's vision of how the area should be redeveloped. <br />