My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/08/14 (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/08/14 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 2:01:21 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:58:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/14/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 14, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. <br /> <br />Hearing no comments, Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6901 <br />Approving a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversize Garage at 2932 Woodale Drive. <br /> <br />Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />B. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 773, an Ordinance Amending <br />the Zoning Code Relating to Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls. <br />(ROLL CALL VOTE) <br /> <br />Director Ericson explained that the ordinance is back for a second reading after the previous <br />second reading on June 26th was tabled. He stated the Amundsens had additional language <br />requests and that the Council tabled action and recommended the City Attorney and Planning <br />Commission review suggested changes. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated the changes were presented to the Planning Commission on August 2nd. <br />He explained the Commission reviewed the changes individually and felt none of the suggested <br />changes should be included in the ordinance and it should be approved as previously presented. <br /> <br />Director Ericson explained that the Planning Commission had previously discussed the language, <br />but determined it does not make sense to incorporate the suggestions universally. He stated the <br />changes could be considered over-legislated in some cases. He stated if the City has control over <br />the land, that there will be railings and protections on retaining walls, but the Planning <br />Commission felt it did not make sense to change the language universally. <br /> <br />Director Ericson stated Staff and the Planning Commission suggest approving the ordinance as it <br />was originally presented. He stated Staff believes the code does sufficiently address some of the <br />concerns brought up by the Amundsens. He added Staff is recommending the ordinance the way <br />it was originally presented because they do not want to over-legislate. <br /> <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. <br /> <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated that when the he brought his and his wife’s <br />concerns to the Planning Commission and Council in the spring, he was told there was no <br />ordinance to address his situation. He stated that the language his wife suggested would <br />specifically address his concern. He stated the suggested wording regarding retaining walls next <br />to pools would have allowed the Council or Planning Commission to deny any retaining wall that <br />is along side a public safety structure. <br /> <br />Mr. Amundsen stated that he suggested additional language regarding public safety and asked the <br />language be incorporated into item seven. He said he is more concerned about safety and <br />commented that building code provides for specific standards and his suggested language falls
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.