Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 28, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> <br />Council Member Marty stated his support to direct staff to contact Anoka County and Mr. <br />Butterfield to obtain more information prior to adoption so a later amendment is not needed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Long suggested it be tabled to the next Council meeting to assure there is no gap <br />between the moratorium and when the ordinance becomes effective. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Table the Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance <br />663, an Ordinance Creating Language to Administer and Regulate Tattoo and Body Piercing <br />Establishments within the City of Mounds View until September 11, 2000. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin was not present for the vote. <br /> <br />C. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 665, an Ordinance Rezoning <br />Properties Associated with the Walgreens Development from B-3 and PF to <br />PUD. <br /> <br />This item was considered earlier in the meeting. <br /> <br />D. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 666, an Ordinance Vacating the <br />Old Edgewood Drive Right of Way Included within the Proposed Walgreens <br />PUD. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that with the realignment of Edgewood Drive through City <br />Hall property, the old alignment (which is legally-described in Exhibit 1 to the proposed <br />ordinance) no longer serves a public purpose and can be vacated. Ordinance 666 is the document <br />by which the vacation is approved. The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance <br />666 at its meeting on August 14, 2000. Since this is not a needed right-of-way, staff <br />recommends approval of the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 666. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To Wave the Reading, Approve the Second Reading <br />and Adopt Ordinance 666, an Ordinance Vacating the Old Edgewood Drive Right of Way <br />Included within the Proposed Walgreens PUD. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL: Thomason, Stigney, Marty, Quick. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mayor Coughlin was not present for the vote. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Stigney stated for the record that this second reading and adoption were approved <br />by the unanimous vote of the Council. <br /> <br />E. First Reading (Introduction) of Ordinance 668, an Ordinance Vacating a <br />Sign Easement No Longer Serving a Public Purpose. <br />