Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 3 <br /> 59a-32 (Cr. Ref. 441h; 477bm34) <br /> i <br /> For the foregoing reasons, it is our opinion that Minn. Stat. a 4na ozi7 of all members of the <br /> authorizing adoption or amendment of certain zoning ordinances by ) ty • <br /> governing body , prevails over inconsistent municipal ordinances or charter provisions_ This reasoning is <br /> consistent with that reached in Op. Atty . Gen. 59,A.32, October 13 , 1955, wl�ieh determined that the <br /> statutory requirement far reached <br /> thirds vote to amend a zoning ordinance prevailed over inconsistent <br /> provisions in a city charter and ordinance. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> IAM HATCH <br /> Attorney General <br /> KENNETH E. RASCI , JR. <br /> Assistant Attorney General <br /> [1 ] <br /> Minn- Const, art. Xll, § 4• <br /> 1VV-d 900/900 ' d 1VV-1 OtE61EEtt9+ ueneag RpeuueN_maad WE V0-1t®adV <br />