Laserfiche WebLink
Messrs_ Ulrich and Ericson <br /> April 27 , 2004 <br /> Page 2 <br /> This opinion is consistent with the Opinion of the Mimiesota Attorney General dated January 25, <br /> 2002 (59a••32) that analyzed the very same issue of an ordinance or charter provision being <br /> inconsistent with the voting requirements contained in Minn. Stat. y 462. 357, subd. 2(b). I have <br /> included a copy of this Attomey General Opinion for your reference to the legal analysis contained <br /> within the Opinion. <br /> Based upon my opinion and the legal analysis contained in the above-referenced Attorney General' s <br /> Opinion, T would strongly suggest that the Platlning Commission and City Council consider revising <br /> any voting requirement contained within the City, s Zollin oCode tthat <br /> av s incon anysistent with <br /> the <br /> the <br /> requirements contained in Minn. Stat. $ 462,357, subd. 20)) <br /> future regarding voting requirements for zoning amendments. <br /> Please feel free to contact me with any Ra-ther questions you may have regarding this anatter. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> KENNED'Y & GRAV N, CHARTERED <br /> Sc0 t J. Riggs <br /> Mounds View City Attomcy <br /> SJRjms <br /> Enclosure <br /> S.IM47087vl <br /> MU27 U-l17 ', <br /> 1VV-d 900/600 ' d 1VV-1 O1 "L8EZl9+ d®neag Rpeuu®H_moad WE VO-1Z-ldV <br />