Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting .�,c .;I . '" <br />July 12, 1982 <br />------------- -------___ <br />1- 3rt-1=-1164 - - ------------------ <br />Page Two <br />Mayor McCarty stated he was concerned that a time 6. <br />frame was not stipulated in the <br />Approve JAgroi <br />agreement, and <br />questioned what could happen if the funds <br />Powers <br />ran out <br />before the project was completed. AttorneyMeyers <br />advised that y <br />with Circle <br />Circle <br />Trails <br />a completion date should be <br />stipulated. <br />fora <br />UybLem Master <br />Plan <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table the joint <br />powers agreement with Circle Pines until the time <br />frame provision in the <br />contract is resolved. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to adopt Resolution 7. <br />o. an waive the <br />Consideration o <br />reading, <br />Resolution No. <br />3 ayes 2 nays <br />1464 Establishii <br />Performance Gui, <br />lines for <br />Clerk/Administr. <br />for <br />Motion Carried <br />Councilmembers Blanchard and Hodges voted against <br />the motion. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated the purpose of the <br />resolution <br />was to establish more guidelines for the <br />Clerk/Administrator position, and <br />suggested that <br />if there are going to be additional duties, the <br />Charter Commission <br />and the public should have some <br />input into the decision. She added she has <br />no <br />problem with directing Staff, but does not feel <br />a resolution is the <br />proper method for that direction. <br />Councilmember Blanchard also expressed <br />concern that <br />in following the direction of the resolution, <br />tuch timeso <br />would <br />hat officeefficiencyncouldpsuffer. <br />She added <br />the resolution is vague and nebulous, and could <br />possibly be used as a method of harrassment. <br />Councilmember Hodges stated he did not feel the <br />resolution <br />was necessary, and would prefer a memo <br />of understanding, which could be reviewed during <br />the yearly evaluation. <br />Councilmember Doty stated he felt this was a Council <br />resolution, not Charter <br />action, and is not meant <br />to be intimidating. <br />Councilmember Forslundof <br />understanding could slost dh a nand <br />get intheeshuffle,lt <br />she did not see any problem with having a resolution, <br />it <br />as will be brought back each year for review and <br />could be changed then. <br />