Laserfiche WebLink
otT)4 <br />Minncsrna hl <br />Af Deparlm;nl f>f'Ir;mslx)iImilni <br />District Five, <br />5801 1XIIU111 `;treel <br />of rid' Golden ValleI, NUM SOW 55422 <br />22 <br />July 22, 1982 <br />Mr. Steven A. Rose <br />Building 6 Zoning Officer <br />City of Mounds View <br />2401 Highway 10 <br />Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 <br />S.P. 0203-68 T.H. 10 <br />From 1500' E. of T.li. 65 to Pleasant View Drive <br />Signals, Channelization and Fr. Rd. Construction <br />Dear Mr. Rose: <br />.rG' A <br />R�CF 1oRz <br />Moo ryop <br />(612) 5453761 <br />As you know, we have been trying for some time to come up with a preliminary <br />plan for the above referenced location which will be acceptable to all of the <br />affected municipalities. Attached for your review and comment is a print of <br />our latest proposal. The project is tentatively scheduled for letting in 1984 <br />and we anticipate funding construction with 90% Federal funds and 10% State <br />and local funds. The local municipalities will be responsible for right of <br />way acquisition. <br />We estimate that the project will require approximately 12,000 sq. ft. of <br />right of way north of TH 10 and approximately 3,000 sq. ft. south of TH 10. <br />We are assuming that the 30' strip of street right of way along the south <br />right of way line of TH 10 is available to construct the proposed frontage <br />road on. <br />The only other costs of the project that the municipalities will have to <br />participate in is the State and local share of the signals and maintenance of <br />them. Our normal participation on the signals is determined by entering legs, <br />Mn/DOT would be responsible for 50% and Mounds View, Ramsey County and Spring <br />Lake Park would be responsible for 509. Assuming the signal system costs <br />$91,000, the Federal share would be $81,000, the State share would be $4,500. <br />The local share would be split with Mounds View paying $1,125, Ramsey County <br />$2,250 and Spring Lake Park $1,125. <br />Also attached for your information and review are traffic counts which were <br />taken in June. We have included an assignment of where this traffic will be <br />after we construct the project. <br />The proposed signal will be fully traffic actuated and will greatly improve <br />access to and from TH 10 in this area. We also feel this design will <br />discourage the use of Pleasant View Drive by traffic not destined for that <br />area but yet will provide a c, venient access. <br />:In Egno( Opp.)iguni(v $updoyer <br />