My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/06/20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/06/20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 3:23:30 PM
Creation date
3/12/2025 3:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/20/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 23, 1983 <br />Regular Meeting Page five <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />,� Attorney Meyers advised that if the Council has been <br />fully informed of the development, it would be per- <br />mitted to now have the developer give his side of <br />the proposal, <br />Larry Malmin and Richard Van Sickle, of Van Sickle, <br />Allan, reviewed the proposed development, showing the <br />blueprint of the project. <br />Mayor McCarty asked if any study had been done on the <br />potential impact of value for the existing home owners, <br />and asked if the developer would be willing to indem- <br />nify the City against lawsuits from home owners. <br />Mr. Malmin stated he was not certain if any study had <br />been done, and that while he could not speak for the <br />developer, he did not feel he would be willing to <br />indemnify the City against lawsuits. <br />Mr. O'Neil stated that he had noticed at the four plex <br />across the street that the people park on the street, <br />rather than in the parking lot, which creates a <br />problem. It was also noted that these renters have <br />as many possessions as home owners, such as boats <br />and trailers and campers and so forth, which they <br />must find some place to park, as well as a place for <br />their cars. It was also noted that their garages are <br />often used totally for storage, rather than the parking <br />of vehicles. <br />Ms. Warren stated the Planning Commission takes into <br />consideration the amount of green space available <br />for snow storage. <br />Mr. Johnson stated he was concerned with traffic and <br />the impact of the vehicles to be parked. He stated <br />he did not feel the minimum requirements were <br />sufficient. <br />Ms. Olson stated she did not feel the 8 trees shown <br />on the blueprint were sufficient for buffering the <br />residential area. Mr. Van Sickle stated lie believed <br />the developer would be willing to put more trees in <br />if it was felt they were needed. <br />The resident who has the wood pile on the developers <br />land stated lie would be willing to move the pile <br />upon request. <br />Ernie Gustafson, owner of the property in question, <br />stated that in dealing with the developer, they <br />had discussed how to screen the residents, and had <br />proposed a 6' redwood fence, as well as other options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.