My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 3:31:39 PM
Creation date
3/12/2025 3:26:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/9/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1'x 4 '` i ip April 25, 1983 <br />t�� P <br />Mounds View City Council � y k .11 Ii `�` � page Four <br />Regular Meeting 5 ___ _ ---------- ___�-_----- <br />-------------------------------------- <br />Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 9B. Ordinan o. <br />the second public hearing at 8:17 PM. 336, Am. g <br />Chapter 4 - <br />Director Johnson explained the proposed amendment <br />Public Hearin <br />to Chapter 48. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the regular meeting at 8:18 PM. <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to adopt Ordinance <br />o, i3b, amending Chapter 48 of the Municipal Code <br />entitled, "Wetlands Zoning Ordinance", and waive <br />the reading. <br />Councilmember Linke - aye <br />Councilmember Hankner - aye <br />Councilmember Blanchard - aye Motion <br />Mayor McCarty - aye <br />Director Johnson reported that now the ordinance had <br />been passed, Dynamic Designers has a proposal for an <br />additional alteration of wetland, and asked when the <br />Council would like to discuss it. <br />Mayor McCarty replied they would discuss it at their <br />next agenda session. <br />I <br />Director Johnson reported that two bids were 10. <br />Consideration <br />of StaffRReor <br />received,Regarding one from IIync Minnesota in the amount of <br />from Keys Well Building in their <br />Re - <br />$8,921.50 and one <br />amount of $8,600, but that with the 130' of fill <br />to ell <br />6 <br />which must be removed, Attorney Meyers has advised <br />No. <br />that the removal be looked at as a variable amount <br />and that the Council move ahead and authorize the <br />work with one contractor. He also noted that it <br />appears that Keys ommitted a $1,000 item from their <br />bid, and that on all major repair items,Iayne was <br />lower in price. He stated both firms gave prices <br />per hour for removing the fill. <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to accept the low <br />proposal, contingent upon resolution of the $1,000 <br />question. <br />Motion Carried <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Mayor McCarty asked for a clarification on emergency <br />Meyers explained that <br />repair authorization. Attorney <br />then the bidding <br />if the Council declares an emergency, <br />so forth does not have to be followed. <br />process and <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.