Laserfiche WebLink
PROCEEDINGS 01: THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />h 4AM"Y (;OIIN'I'Y, iI1MiJI:SO'I'A <br />UNAPROVED I;c;;ula4, 1983 <br />playy 498 <br />Mounds View City Hall <br />2401 Ilwy. 10, Mounds View, MP! 55112 <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to 1. Call to <br />order by Chairman mountin ❑t 7:36 1'M. <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Quick, Warren, 2. Roll Call <br />Anderson, Fors and and Chairman Mountin. <br />It was noted Commissioners Miller and McCarthy had <br />excused absenscs. <br />ALSO PRESENT: Engineering/Planning Technician Kampel <br />and Councilmember Blanchard. <br />Motion/Second: Warren/Quick to approve the April 6, 3. Approval of <br />I 3 m�$ inutes as presented. Minutes: <br />�.�. C 5 ayes 0 nays April 6, 198 <br />•--- Motion Carri <br />There were no resideuts requests or commicnts from 4. Residents <br />the floor. quests and <br />Comments f <br />the Floor <br />Technician Kampel stated the proposed development has <br />5. Tony Poppelae <br />been before the Planning Commission and City Council <br />7662/7664 <br />many times, and reviewed it. <br />Woodlawn Dr., <br />Development <br />Mr. Poppelaars stated he was concerned with the berming <br />Proposal, Wet <br />requirement, as he did not feel it would help with the <br />lands Altera- <br />parking, but would create run-off for the neighbor to <br />tions Permit <br />the south. He stated he would prefer to have "No Park- <br />Review, R-3 <br />ing" signs installed along the street. <br />Residential <br />Dstr., <br />The Planning Conuuissioners reviewed their reasons for <br />Case 125-83 <br />requiring the berming, and decided they would not set <br />the specific requirements, but rather leave that up <br />to an engineering firm. <br />There was considerable discussion among the Commissioners <br />of proposed Resolution No. 75-83, with concern being <br />expressed regarding the variance for the buffer zone and <br />the 10' setback, and run-off, and :hether any criteria <br />had been established to measure t! run-off. Technician <br />Kampel informed the CO:Oinissionerf at cri:::•ria was <br />