My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 3:28:33 PM
Creation date
3/12/2025 3:28:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/23/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3-4 <br />i� <br />the channel to enlarge unless devices are used to protect the channel. <br />The prolonged duration of flow saturates the banks to a greater extent <br />and leads to increased streambank erosion. <br />5. Many facilities that are designed to control only a single storm <br />event (10- or 100-year) do "Little or nothing to control more frequent <br />storm events. Many citizens in the Atlanta area are complaining about the <br />increased frequency of small flood events which the detention basins are <br />not controlling. <br />6. Detention facilities are required regardless of what drainage facilities <br />are located downstream. Thus, there are some detention basins that drain <br />directly to large lakes with no flooding problems, major rivers where <br />the amounts of water discharging from the development site is insignificant, <br />and large undeveloped farm land areas with no apparent flooding problems. <br />The esthetics and costs of detention basins can be a cause for major concern <br />to both the developers and their clients, whether they are leasing commerical <br />space or buying homes. <br />Detention facilities can take on a park -like appearance and enhance the <br />esthetic appearance of an area. <br />2. The more usual case is that these facilities are unsightly and detract <br />from the general appearance of an area because the facilities are <br />poorly designed and maintained. <br />3. The construction cost of on -site detention basins is often relatively <br />inexpensive. <br />4. The real cost is in the land which must be used for the facility and t <br />�o <br />thus Left undeveloped. In residential areas several building sites 0'rQ fo� <br />may have to be used, while commercial developments often lose" large �4� <br />areas of very expensive land. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.