My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/05/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2025 3:28:33 PM
Creation date
3/12/2025 3:28:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/23/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
983 <br />Mounds View City Council May 9, 1 <br />Regular Meeting Page Seven <br />------------ ------- <br />Mayor McCarty stated that in reference to the plans <br />that were approved, granting services to lots 17, 18 <br />and 19, they were approved at the same time easements <br />were given, which is not compatible, and was an over - <br />site. <br />Park Director Anderson reported the Park Board has been <br />dealing with the issue of leaf composting for the past <br />few years, and it has come to the City's attention that <br />�* <br />Ramsey County is considering expanding their compost <br />1� <br />program, and they are considering Mounds View as a <br />He reported the Park Board had reviewed <br />L IJ <br />.;,� <br />possible site. <br />it and feel very positive about it, as it would cost <br />�r <br />the City basically no money, with the funding coming <br />from the County. Some locations they discussed were <br />Ardan Park, or Greenfield Park, or the old Moega Farm. <br />It was the concensus of the Council to have Staff draw <br />.= <br />up the necessary resolution for the proposed compost <br />project. <br />2' <br />Councilmember Blanchard asked the status of the problem <br />with the delivery of the City newsletter. Park Director <br />Anderson replied there had been many problems with <br />' <br />delivery this time, and they are looking at other options. <br />He stated he would be getting back to the Council with <br />a report. <br />Councilmember Hankner reported she had still not 10. <br />Consideration <br />Action Re - <br />received a written report from her Counsel, and hopes <br />would <br />of <br />garding <br />to have it very soon. She stated she prefer <br />to table action until she receives it. <br />View DFL Club <br />Use of City <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to direct Staff to <br />Corporate Nam- <br />notiTy the Mounds View DFL Club not to use the <br />City's name on their literature. <br />Motion Carrie <br />4 ayes 1 nay <br />Councilmember Hankner voted against the motion, stating <br />she would prefer waiting for a legal opinion, and she <br />did not feel the motion differed from motions made at <br />previous meetings. <br />Councilmember Linke asked for clarification of how the <br />notice was to be made, and by whom. Mayor McCarty <br />replied that it would be by Staff, which the Council <br />interpreted as not to be City Attorney Meyers, and <br />it would be in the normal manner used by Staff to <br />notify people of violations. <br />Director Johnson reviewed his memo of May 9 to the 11. Report of <br />Council, concerning the Mr. Donut development Director of <br />proposal, and reviewed the changes the applicant Public Works/ <br />has made in his proposed development. Comm. Dvlpmt. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.