My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1982/11/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Agenda Packets - 1982/11/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:37:07 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:37:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/8/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO - Wayne Ilerr CUIR1O111iniUm Proposal <br />August 25, 1982 ' <br />Page 2 <br />The Planning Comm.is:;ion may want to refrain from granting ' approval until nlaff has received a copy of a current <br />approved permit from RCWD. <br />ol'1)ermit. Staff will advise as to receipt <br />4) 1,500 gallons per minute fire flow - The revised plans show <br />an 0 inch looped watermain out to Highway 10 then along the <br />south side of Highway 10 connecting to the 12 inch main on <br />Groveland Road. Staff's review of this proposal indicate <br />that this system should provide, the necessary pressure and <br />fire flow to serve the proposed:development. <br />5) Fire Department's decision on knock -down barrier - The fire <br />department has indicated that they still need additional <br />information on the proposed knock -down barriers for this <br />developmentā¢. Staff has informed the fire department to ask <br />the engineer directly for additional information needed to <br />render a decision. We will receive copies of any new plans <br />and any decision by the fire department and forward copies <br />to you. <br />6) 40 foot distance from northern building to north property <br />linte <br />lan <br />theeaboveerevised location.S1Thepengineersdid1notnce havean f0feet at <br />opportunity <br />. <br />to redraw the plan showing this 40 feet to scale. The plan <br />does nonetheless show 40 feet. <br />7) The obtaining of a valid access permit to Highway 10 - Staff <br />has spoken to officials of MnDOT regarding access to Highway 10. <br />They said that, for the most part, the permit has already been <br />approved. An application has been submitted and reviewed and, <br />pending receipts of fees, the permit will be issued. MnDOT is <br />requiring two items prior to permit approval: <br />a. a 32 foot driveway entrance. The site plan does <br />show a 32 foot driveway; and <br />b. a right turn lane off of Highway 10. <br />Staff concurs with the MnDOT findings and in addition, would <br />recoimnend an acceleration lane with a 50 foot curb radius from <br />this development to eastbound Highway 10. <br />0) easement for access to the property to the east - The revised ++ <br />plans do show an easement adjacent to Highway 10 for possible I. future access to the property to the east. <br />II <br />The only loose ends at this point would seem to be: <br />1) Snow removal issue. ' <br />2) Rice Creek Watershed District Permit receipt. <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.