My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1982/12/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Agenda Packets - 1982/12/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:38:06 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:38:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/6/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ID/8/a2 <br />MINNESOTA'S HAZARDOUS WASTES <br />The amount of hazardous waste generated varies constantly, depending on <br />production levels at manufacturing plants, and changes in product lines and <br />manufacturing methods. Current estimates are based on two sources: disclosures <br />submitted by waste generators to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the <br />Metropolitan Counties under the State hazardous waste rules, and an estimate <br />based on industry -specific information gathered in other states. From these <br />sources, we estimate that approximately 200,000 tons per year of hazardous <br />wastes are generated in Minnesota --and as much as 3/4 of this comes from the <br />seven -county Metro area. However, no one company is responsible for a <br />significant portion of the waste stream, and over 2500 waste generators have <br />been identified by the regulatory program. <br />The wastes generated in Minnesota can be divided into a number of categories <br />based on their physical and chemical characteristics. The principal categories <br />of wastes we generate are: <br />1) HEAVY METALS AND INORGANIC RESIDUALS. This is the largest category, <br />and reflects the predominance of the electronic, primary metal, and <br />fabricated metal product industries in Minnesota. <br />What are the wastes? They include spent electroplating and etching <br />baths, rinse waters from electroplating, sludges from these <br />operations, and other acid and alkaline solutions used in the <br />manufacture of metal products. <br />Why are theZ hazardous? Certain metals commonly used in these <br />industries chromium, cadmium, nickel) are toxic. If they are <br />placed in a sanitary landfill, they can contaminate groundwater. <br />If they are sewered, as many wastes currently are, they can <br />disrupt sewage treatment plant operations and contaminate the <br />sludge from these plants, making this sludge harder to dispose of <br />safely. Some plating operations use toxic "complexing agents" <br />such as cyanide or sulfide. Acidic and alkaline solutions are <br />corrosive. <br />How should these materials be handled? Chemical treatment of <br />these wastes is relatively easy and is a well -established procedure. <br />Cyanides can be readily destroyed (many generators do this on -site). <br />Toxic metals can be precipitated (converted to solid compounds) and <br />separated from wastewater, which can then be sewered. The resulting <br />precipitate may require disposal in a secure landfill. Acids and <br />bases are easily neutralized. <br />What facilities does Minnesota need? The need for treatment facilities <br />is perhaps most acute in this category of wastes. Currently, many <br />of these wastes are ser;ered, but pretreatment regulations which are <br />taking effect will result in the need for facilities to treat the <br />wastes. Anaqueous treatment plant which provides neutralization, <br />cyanide destruction, chromium reduction, and metal precipitation is <br />one of the most effective ways to handle these wastes. Residues from <br />this facility could require secure landfill at another location. A <br />metal recovery plant which recovers metals from wastewaters for reuse <br />i aTso possible --the Twin Cities Metal Finishers Association is <br />studying the feasibility of such a facility. <br />(over) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.