Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />-3- <br />- What facilities does Minnesota need? Most facilities to manage <br />waste oils and greases are in place. There could be some <br />interest in a oil rerefinery utilizing up-to-date technology. <br />Transfer stations wou a useful regional or central collection <br />sites. <br />4) PAINT AND ORGANIC RESIDUES, ORGANIC SLUDGES AND STILL BOTTOMS (NO OIL), <br />and ORGANIC AND OILY RESIDUES. These are the major groupings of <br />organic wastes other than lube oils), and they have been aggregated <br />here because these wastes can be managed in similar ways. These <br />diverse wastes are generated by industries which recycle their own <br />solvents on -site or by commercial solvent redistillers, industries <br />which manufacture products requiring painting or gluing, chemical <br />manufacturers, and refineries. <br />- What are these wastes? They include still bottoms (the residue <br />remaining after solvents are purified by distillation), paint <br />spray booth residues, some refinery wastes, industrial wastewater <br />treatment sludges, adhesives, and miscellaneous by-products of <br />chemical manufacturing. <br />- Why are they hazardous? Depending on the individual waste, these <br />materials may be flammable or toxic. Some organic compounds are <br />themselves quite toxic; these compounds, fortunately, do not make <br />' up a signficant portion of the state's wastes. However, many <br />organic wastes, such as paint wastes or refinery wastes, contain <br />toxic metals. <br />How should they be handled? Most of these materials are not <br />recoverab a for rl — ease, However, nearly all organic wastes can be <br />effectively destroyed through incineration, Certain selected <br />wastes can be solidified for landfill or landfarmed, <br />- What facilities does Minnesota need? A signficant portion of <br />the wastes generated in Minnesota should be destroyed through <br />incineration. However, a hazardous waste incinerator often <br />represents a very large investment ($10 - 20 million), and <br />economies of scale dictate that units capable of burning relatively <br />large volumes of waste be constructed. Minnesota probably doesn't <br />produce the volumes of waste necessary to supply a high cost <br />rotary kiln incinerator, so for the near future a transfer station <br />to aggregate wastes for shipments to incineration facilities ies in <br />the upper Midwest is most likely. Small, more specialized types <br />of incinerators could conceivably be developed if there is a need <br />for a specific kind of unit. In addition, recent developments in <br />the field of wet air oxidation may lead to development of facilities <br />which don't require large inputs of waste to operate economically <br />(wet air oxidation is a variation of incineration which does not <br />require extremely high temperatures to achieve destruction of wastes). <br />(over) <br />