My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1982/12/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Agenda Packets - 1982/12/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:39:09 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:39:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/13/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development <br />DATE: December 8, 1982 <br />SUBJECT: WAYNE RERR/KNOLLWOOD GREEN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />At the December 15, 1982 Council Agenda Session, the Council <br />briefly discussed the conditional use permit and set the public <br />hearing date for the above item for December 13, 1982. At that <br />Agenda Session, questions were raised by the Mayor and this memo <br />attempts to address those questions: <br />1) The applicant proposes to provided a blanket easement <br />over all common property excluding the building and <br />garage footprints for purposes of access and utilities. <br />This will allow development and access to adjoining <br />properties if future development is necessary and/or <br />desired. <br />2) Attached are some alternate street and/or access plans <br />that were developed and furnished to the Planning Commis- <br />sion during their review of this application. Alternate <br />layouts 1 through 7 were furnished to the Planning <br />Commission with layouts 6 and 7 being the ones most <br />favored by the majority of the Planning Commission. It <br />should be noted that none of these alternates would allow <br />the development of the plan as presented by the developer. <br />Alternate sketch 8 was a layout developed at the sugges- <br />tion of the developer's engineer and would allow access to <br />those properties lying westerly of the proposed project <br />and would at the same time allow the proposed plan to <br />proceed as presented. <br />3) The Comprehensive Plan proposed the northerly portion of <br />the site to be in a medium density land use with the southern <br />portion of the sf.te in a low density land use. This diverges <br />from the existing zoning of the parcel which is R-3. Medium <br />density of 3 to 6 units per acre, if assumed to occur over <br />the north 25 to 30 percent of the site, would allow approxi- <br />mately 6.6 units and low density of 1 to 2 units over the <br />southerly 65 to 70 percent of the site would allow for 4.2 <br />units to be developed for a total of 10.8 units on the entire <br />site. The applicant proposes a 32 unit project. R-3 zoning <br />historically has allowed high density development which under <br />the Code allows multi -family units at a density of 1 per 2,500 <br />square feet. Thiswould in turn allow on this site of 138,000 <br />square feet 55.2 units. The City Council has been previously <br />appraised of legal opinions that have been rendered in court <br />decisions on the issue of whether the Comprehensive Plan or <br />the Zoning Plan controls. Staff has processed this application <br />based on utilizing the existing zoning of R-3 on site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.