My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1982/12/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Agenda Packets - 1982/12/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:40:08 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:40:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/27/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 13,•1982, <br />Regular Meeting Page Six <br />------------------------------------------------ - ------------------------- <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Mr. Loosen had <br />12. Considers' <br />submitted a letter earlier in the day which answers <br />of Applic <br />the questions raised by the Council earlier. <br />for Restaurant <br />License and <br />Mayor McCarty questioned if Mr. Loosen and his wife <br />Transfer of <br />would be the principle officers of the corporation. <br />On -Sale Liquor <br />Mr. Loosen replied they would be. Attorney Meyers <br />License from <br />pointed out the City does not issue corporate <br />Richard and <br />licenses, but that .a corporation could be set up <br />Marlene Povlit- <br />for business purposes. Mr. Loosen replied that was <br />zki to James <br />his intent. <br />A. Loosen <br />Mayor McCarty questioned the response on the on -sale <br />intoxicating liquor license application, which stated <br />",yet to be determined", and questioned if there would <br />be another owner. Mr. Loosen replied that referred <br />to the name of the establishment and could be removed. <br />Mayor McCarty questioned if the various managers and <br />employees of the establishment would be corporate <br />officers. Mr. Loosen replied they would not be. <br />Attorney Meyers stated there is no relevence if an <br />employee has an interest in another liquor establish- <br />ment. <br />In response to questioning, Mr. Loosen stated he has <br />an employee code, with guidelines for his employees <br />to follow, which he has used at other of his establish- <br />ments and found to be very well received. <br />Mayor McCarty questioned if the City can require <br />compliance of the memo in question as part of the <br />license. Attorney Meyers replied that it should <br />constitute part of the file, and that the Council <br />has other concerns. <br />Attorney Meyers advised Mr. Loosen will have to be <br />the owner before a license can be issued. Mr. Loosen <br />replied they will be closing on January 3, 1983. <br />Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges that the Council approve <br />t e icense transfer from Richard and Marlene Povlitzki <br />to James A. Loosen, on the date of the title transfer <br />of the property, January 3, 1982. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Attorney Meyers advised Mr. Loosen to come to City Hall <br />on January 3, 1983 and show evidence to the Clerk/ <br />Administrator that the transfer has taken place. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.