My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/01/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/01/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:46:54 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:46:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/24/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
h , <br />Mounds View City Counc It January 10, 1983 <br />Regul.ar Meeting Page Six <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br />that a vendor or anyone installing a sign would ' <br />be required to be licensed in the City, and that a <br />Permit is required for each sign, and the fees <br />involved can only be waived for a religious or <br />civic organization, by the City Council, He also <br />noted that permits can be approved by the Clerk/ <br />Administrator, but that special approval is <br />needed from the Council for unusual, or illuminated, <br />signs. Ile noted that if the Council approves the <br />sign in question, it would be sufficient autho- <br />rization for the Clerk/Administrator to issue a <br />permit. <br />Mr. McFarlane stated the problem is in having a <br />permit required for each sign and each time one <br />is rented or placed. Attorney Meyers replied <br />that the ordinance does call for a permit each <br />time. <br />There was discussion among the Council regarding <br />the fees, and it was noted the resolution that <br />set the fees would have to be researched. There <br />was also concern expressed about the placement <br />of the signs. <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard that the Council <br />re er the temporary sign issue to the Planning <br />Commission for their recommendation. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Director Johnson stated he would have the Planning <br />Department see if it could be added to the next <br />Planning Commission agenda, and get back to <br />Mr. McFarlane. <br />Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hankner to approve the 8. Consideration <br />Tabor relations subscriber service renewal, in of Staff Memo <br />the amount of $1,485.00. Regarding <br />Labor Relations <br />5 ayes 0 nays Subscriber Svc. <br />Motion Carried <br />Director Johnson reported they have received 3 9. Report of <br />quotations for the repair of the drive shaft in Director of <br />well #2, with the low bid being from Robert Public Works/ <br />Rode, at $550, versus $1,025 and $1,280. He Community <br />explained Mr. Rode does this work on the side DevelopmJ <br />and has access to the required machinery. He <br />also stated Mr. Rode will guarantee his work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.