Agenda Packets - 1983/02/07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Plhh.O 'I'U1rh-Adml.nistrul.ur sad Clly Couucil ' I'ROM1 UlruuLor ui. Pubilu Works/Community Duvulopmont DATE! Fob1•uary 3, 1903 HURJ11,01'1 PIt0P0UM11 M8,HMAID ADDITION Thu I'lanning Conmllfill ioil, at thuir Pobrunry 2, 1903 meeting, reeom- monded approval of t1w proponod addition to the Mermaid Supper Club. Allachud pl(nuo Hod a ropy of the fulluwlug: 1) Planning Comminalon kosoluLlon No. 70-03 2) Planning Comminnlon Minuted or ,lanunry 5, 19113 3) Staff Planning Report 4) Sll:o flan The queution of adequate storm water holding area was discussed at staff level and with the Commission, 'rho pronent situation is as follows; The storm water holding ponds which pronontl.y oxlst on the Mermaid property (along County Road II) are inadequate based on current Ordinance (Chapter 49A) from a storngo capacity standpoint. The proposed development will. bo adding additional hard surface area to the property, thus making these ponds more inadequate, though the amount of additional holding pond required for the addition itself would be small, Rica Crook Waternhod District review and/or approval will be ruquirud for' this pi:uposed dcvclopmPnt. It should be noted that Mounds View RosoluL.ion No. 903 was not in effect when the bowling alloy addition wall proposed so minimal on -site pending was required by the City. Staff has spoken to Mee Creek Watershed concerning this proposal and they said that they are uncertain at this time whether they may require the Mermaid to pond additionally for this proposal, to require pending for the entire site or neither. Staff soon the following two possible alternatives for City Council direction: 1) The Council recently adopted Ordinance No. 328 (Chapter 49A) requiring on -site ntor.age. No direct mention is made in the Ordinance relating to whether the City would require storage for Just nuw devulopmonL (in this case the addition only) or for the entire site. Those, we see, are options the Council has relating to Chapter 49A: a) Require additional storage for the new addition (this amount is relatively small); or b) Require storage for the entire building and the entire parking area. If this option is elected, additional land may be required since the Code requires all parking spaces which they presently have. (Please note that this application is the first under new 49A and woul.' ssibly se` a precedent for future applications.)