My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/02/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/02/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:48:57 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:48:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
q4511t� 3 <br />TO: Mayor & Council <br />fllzROM: Finance Director -Treasurer I:rager <br />DATE: February 16, 1983 <br />RE: RECLASSIFICATION OF PROCEEDS OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1981 <br />While preparing 1982 Financial Statements I noticed that <br />the Silver Lake Woods Construction Fund had a deficit cash balance. <br />That fact greatly surprised me because I knew that total project <br />costs were under budget. Upon further investigation I discovered <br />that the bond proceeds had been improperly allocated between the <br />Debt Service and Construction Funds when received in 1981; thus <br />causing the deficit in the Construction Fund. <br />The financial consultant in establishing the budget for the <br />project indicated that $329,906 should be placed in the Debt Service <br />Fund for capitalized interest (payment of interest on the bonds until <br />we begin receiving payments of special assessments). This amount was <br />allocated to the Debt Service Fund. A review of the bond agreement, <br />which was prepared by the bonding attorney, indicates that only <br />$188,325 should have been placed in the Debt Service Fund. The <br />allocation of bond proceeds to the Construction Fund was thus $141,582 <br />less than it should have been. <br />I have discussed this matter with our auditors and they agree <br />that the bond proceeds were improperly classified and should be re- <br />classified pursuant to the bond agreement. The auditors recommend <br />that the Council authorize this reclassification of bond proceeds <br />since the previous classification was, in effect, authorized by Council <br />acceptance of the 1981 Financial Statements. The reclassification <br />would have the effect of increasing cash in the Construction Fund by <br />$141,582, thus eliminating the cash deficit in the fund. <br />The reclassification is necessary from an accounting stand- <br />point so that the Construction Fund will have a positive cash balance <br />when the project is finalized. our ability to make debt service pay- <br />ments will in no way be impaired because any residual funds in the <br />Construction Fund after the project is completed would be available, <br />if needed, to make bond principal and interest payments. <br />A proposed <br />bond proceeds is <br />any questions do <br />DB/ds <br />resolution authorizing the reclassification of the <br />attached for your consideration. Should you have <br />not hesitate to contact me. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.