My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/03/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/03/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 9:52:37 AM
Creation date
3/13/2025 9:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-2-. <br />5. The developer of a facility within an area on the inventory must undergo <br />review by the Board before the developer may apply for Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency (MPCA) permits. Minn. Stat. § 115A.10. This review includes <br />examination of the prospective facility operator's technical and financial <br />competence. <br />6. If a developer -of a'facility'wfiirFwi11'beFloCetedHwitbfiAan�6rea'Sb7l)BCha <br />inventory:obtains' neces'saryTpermit"s from%tfie;MPCA"'Sifd"�9'polariir8lusiltRtl tn� <br />refuses'C'to approve �tfie"`re'stabl'i?if9GentfiRr.�ope�atjon;ro�bE�fa'�lm't'y�Ehlb� <br />may seekifsllpplemerltary•:rev,ieW`'o'f;it'he o79'�Ca1�. u 'i3A'fi5"t?�'e�h. <br />Stag,S�;J'15A:33.•'(1962), ;�,Fol•lowing"a�Y!irView""of"th'e":rde"'rci�s'i n, nc � p 81�0 <br />hearing ,;the':Board. may ;approve7or;disapprove"the fOgilltyVW.BOOMIMtltib <br />to�appro a tffe�facil)ty;•£fie B'oardade'�i•YTon:'sGpS?theZdeO,tS1t5�Ot�L�E <br />?poTi't'1'c31L�5Gbdivision:':rFlion:"'�ia�'§'f'11�i37; sutid�7>�L3'(1982p. <br />1. Ru'%s gove"rning•the-suppl'emen£ary review-processvjtAye Beer fl6p"te G� <br />r„ <br />8 201-->8;21'8): ".7hese;cul.es;�provide*,for aVkdi>ii7675 rocess e6c'oSR <br />{nutuatly�agreeatilP'resolGtion o"f rthe dlfferencesd"eetiie<�rop s e o4'"`ep 9 <br />'aril'ttie'pbl.itical-sutidiv"isioni 'The rules al so pF"MT''for �Gtil'fdA.Tyie'�a7R¢6"f�ffi!1 <br />appointment,`ofbers �6 mem, of"tfie'affect'ed'commun3.ty�6tifie•�oard'as votKng•m <br />to ad'dre"§'s''th'e"disputed issue'. <br />8. In making its decision concerning the proposed facility during supplementary <br />review, the Board must consider at least: <br />a,) The risk and effect of the proposed facility on local residents, units <br />of government and the local public health; <br />b.) The consistency of the proposed facility with, and its effect on, <br />existing and planned local land use and development; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.