Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION, <br />,Page 3 <br />Nay Votes (cont.): <br />i. Breske: 2) Feels adequate study has been given <br />1 to the proposal by the Planning <br />Co nlssion. <br />3) Developer shouldn't be put off any <br />longer. <br />4) To insure cooperative development <br />between the City and the developer. <br />Wu ucud Lo make a positive recomnenda- <br />Lion and provide support for r(lcummcu- <br />dation and our concerns 'to the Council.. <br />Glazer: Feels that the second part of the resolu- <br />tion is superfluous, but does agree with <br />the reconuncndation to dolly. <br />Warren: We have given adequate study to the <br />proposal, that we should list our <br />reconnendations to the Council regarding <br />wetlands, reads, fire protection, ctc, <br />that we should pas- this proposal oil to <br />the Council for their consideration. <br />{ Fedor: Cannot support a denial and apprnval <br />combination in the same muLion. <br />,1 Muuntin: Concurs with previous staLameoLu. <br />MuLion/Second: Breske/Warren moved Lo adupt kvsolu- <br />Lion No. 03-01 (Exhibit D ) rocoumondiny approval <br />of the Preliminary Miller Industrial Plat. <br />4 ayes 4 Nay:: <br />Nay Votes: <br />Millur: Thu wu land plutuclion lu-uv nhuuld be <br />reoolved before the parcel in nuJntivld(!d. <br />Glazert Agrees with thu duvolopur that I'.II,D, dunignation <br />in not lu L.ho bunt iltturuuLā¯‘ of the City or <br />the duvelupor and In IIoL able Lo m,lku ,: <br />recununrm .11 il): wilhout Imnwinq Lill, ;+oolnq. <br />Luedingl A vote for nuhdivinlon lu a voLu againsL <br />prunurvJny thu wot.lnnd. <br />Tudor: I'0U)11 01,11 our oPlJolln in protection of <br />thu woL1,:11d would hu mL:lm,11 once lhu <br />' parcul Ill nuhdivldud. <br />n'oyulAr Meeting <br />January 7, 1901 <br />MOTION FAILS <br />