My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:55:51 AM
Creation date
3/17/2025 10:55:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/22/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
^? <br />Mounds View City Council <br />August 22, 1983 <br />Regular Meeting % '' • <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />i Page Five <br />"`` Director Johnson reviewed his memo of August 22 <br />15. Consideration <br />to the Council, concerning the 1983 sealcoat and <br />of Staff Memo <br />street repairs. Ile presented an overhead map <br />Regarding 1983 <br />of the City, showing the streets scheduled for <br />Sealcoat Pro - <br />repair, and options available, <br />ject and Autho <br />rization to <br />Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to authorize the <br />Advertise for <br />Director of Public: {Yorks/Community Development Lo <br />Bids <br />let the bids for the seal coat program, with the <br />opening to be September 8, and including Longview <br />Road between Woodcrest and County Road H, and Red <br />Oak Drive between County Road H2 and County Road <br />11, as alternative possibilities for seal coating. <br />Funds are identified in the budget for 1983. Also, <br />Staff is authorized to complete by force account <br />with department personnel or by negotiated prices <br />with contractors the minor street re airs within <br />the project area up to a maximum of U5,000. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />Director Johnson reviewed his memo of August 22 16. <br />Consideration <br />to the Council concerning a consultant for review <br />of Staff Memo <br />of the Miller Industrial Park wetland data. <br />Regarding Hiri- <br />a Consultant ti <br />Acting Mayor Blanchard stated she felt a third <br />Review Wetland <br />party was necessary to protect the integrity of <br />Issued Raised <br />the wetland ordinance. <br />Per Miller <br />Industrial Par! <br />Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to allow Staff to <br />Proposal <br />proceed with a working agreement with Braun <br />Engineering Testing, and develop a working <br />contract to have them study and review the existing <br />field data, supplement field data as necessary, <br />analyze existing soil and vegatative materials as <br />they relate to the wetland areas, analyze ground <br />water hydrologic conditions, establish or assess <br />near and long term impacts on site wetland charac- <br />teristics due to variances in hydrologic cycles and <br />existing man-made features, and recoimuend to the <br />City what, if any, changes can or should be considered <br />to the area regulated by the wetland ordinance, in <br />conjunction with the Miller Industrial Park, with the <br />cost not to exceed $5,000, with the funds to come <br />from the SWM fund. <br />3 ayes 1 nay <br />Motion Carried <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she had voted against <br />the motion as she felt that spending the money for <br />a consulting engineering firm may not be the best <br />use of the money when there are State professionals <br />available to the City to use, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.