Agenda Packets - 1983/08/22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MEMO TO: Plowing Cuuunins, ifill FROM: Enginearinq/I'I.uwin,l Technician O'' Ik\'IH: July 2, I'lltl SUUJl:CT: CURGl:NT k1F'1:0Ii11n: lit:011li:i'I". Wciuhnld I'Ciencs,il (1)cci�t:cl.incl Confer) SLalf spoke wiLh ALLurney Moyers Lugarding Lhis propusud rezoning of this parc•rd of land on Highway 10 I•cl.•. n" Crot'oland Rand and Sring We Road. it was ALL"rnoy Meyers' opinion that the rezoning ul. this parcel Isom Lhe cxizt.ng R-1, Single Family to H-4, Regional Buiinvni, would b-• a 11tr ihlc obstacle created in the suit presently being prepared ar,ninst Highway Ul Radiator, Were Life 111.,nning Commission Lu ruconnund and Lhe City Council ultimately rezone thin prnperly to M-4, prinr to the suit hoinil Jocitk!l, l.hi.s may give, tho judge hunring the case a clear indical. dun Ilial. the Icily i"Londs Lhin area Ln he commercial. 1L was Lhen recommended by Cuimclimember Blanchard that the inform.n.Lonal meeting pn"punvd by Lhe Planning Commission be delayed until a courL decininn Is reached on the Highway 10 Radiator lssUe. If. the Weinhold's did submit a formal application, then the Planning Commini ion may decide to conduct this informational meeting and receive citizen input on the request prior to rendering a recommendation. In summary, the: City Attorney dons not: recommend a rezoning of this property to BY prLur to the court decision on the Highway 10 Radiator case. A review of the proposed Zoning Code language was made to determine if an adequate number of parking spaces could be achieved using proposer; oft-sLreet parking language,. It was determined that a sufficient number of parking spaces would not be possible even when using the new language. Therefore, the Planning Commission would need to grant: a variance, of two parkng spaces to allow the conversion of the fourpLex to an office building as pre"ontud. Secondly, staff discussed the Planning Commission's recommendation to rezone this property to B-2 with Attorney Meyers Ind he had no problem with the Commission's recommendation. In fact, Attorney Meyers stated that a B-2 use on the property may have less of an impact on surrounding uses than an R-1 use would, He also stated that this rezoning would have; little impact on the lawsuit as discussed above. Should you have any questions on the above two items, please contact me.