Laserfiche WebLink
Page _ of <br />CHECKLIST FOR DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS <br />IMPACTED BY CHAPTER 48 <br />Submittal Date <br />Revision Date <br />Project <br />• <br />Ordinance Section <br />Code Requirements <br />Council Decision <br />Required <br />Staff Review/ <br />Compliance Decision <br />Comments <br />_ <br />Yes <br />No <br />48.01 Subd, 2 <br />Is proposal In compliance with the following: M.S, (Minnesota <br />Statutes (M.S.) 104, M.S. 105, M.S. 112, R.C.W.D. Regulations, <br />D.N.R. Regulations, Public Law 92-500, Met Council Open Space <br />Policies, <br />48.01, Subd, 2A <br />Are Wetlands Preserved in as natural a state as possible? <br />Are all other requirements as listed in this section met? <br />48.01, Subd. 2B <br />Does the proposal represent sound land use development which <br />will result in the minimum damages and economic losses cited? <br />48.01, Subd, 30 <br />Does proposal preserve and enhance the existing condition of <br />the wetland? <br />Would techniques be applied so as to minimize ratios of <br />Impermeable surface to open space? <br />18.02 <br />Does proposal require amending the wetland map? <br />18.03 <br />Are uses proposed In conformance with underlying zoning <br />district? <br />18.04 <br />Definitions <br />I8.05, Subd. I <br />Does this proposal require a wetlands alteration permit? <br />(See 48.06, Subd, 1) <br />Has a wetlands alteration permit been applied for? <br />8.05, Subd. 2 <br />Are buildings other than accessory buildings proposed within <br />the wetland? <br />