Laserfiche WebLink
October 7, 1983 <br />Page 2 <br />The general map adopted by the City without the benefit of <br />on -site inspection, showed a larger area of wetlands. <br />Both consulting engineers for the City and the City Engineer <br />and our consulting engineer agreed that the wetlands map should be <br />amended to reflect these findings by the City's consulting <br />engineers. <br />At that meeting, the Millers presented again their plan for <br />alteration of a small area of the agreed upon wetland area. <br />That plan included the filling of the one acre 'wetland' in <br />the northwest corner and the filling of approximately 11 acres in <br />the northeast corner and south central portion of the property. <br />The Millers would create 12 acres of new wetland, water area and <br />wildlife habitat. Of this 12 acres, 5.5 acres will be water, <br />approximately 6.5 acres is transitional and upland area which will <br />now be available forever as wetland, transitional and upland <br />wildlife habital areas and flood control areas. <br />All of the engineers present agreed that it was more <br />beneficial to the City to have a consolidated 31 acres of wetland <br />and habitat area than to have a disjointed and spread out <br />collection of small unrelated wetland and habitat areas which <br />presently exist. 11 <br />B. Present Status of Application <br />1. All present agreed that the wetlands map must be <br />amended to reflect the agreed upon wetland area. The Council on <br />Monday, October 10, 1983, Will set a public hearing for October <br />24, 1983, and will, hopefully, amend the map that evening to <br />reflect the actual wetland boundaries on the Miller property. <br />Concerning the 1.1 acre in the west corner of the property, <br />the Millers believe that this area is not and should not be a <br />'wetland' protected by the ordinance. The Millers request that <br />the map be amended to exclude this area. The City consulting <br />engineer from Braun and the engineer from Barr agreed that this <br />area served no beneficial purpose. It is too small to support <br />wildlife and too small for flood control or water quality <br />enhancement or water recharge. Moreover, Jim Miller proved that <br />this area had historically drained to the north through a culvert <br />and only because the road had been built and the culvert not <br />maintained, was water artificially trapped on their property, <br />to <br />