Laserfiche WebLink
CHECKLIST 1`401*11.LOPMEW PROPOSALS <br />IMPACTED BY C... iER 49 <br />Page _7 of <br />• <br />49.07 Subd, 3 (1) <br />Is the doeislon of the Board of Adjustmen' and P;tpoals Laing <br />appealed to the City Council? <br />Is the decision of the City Council being appealed to the <br />district court as provided in Minnesota Statutes 462,36'? <br />49,07 Subd, 4 (a) <br />Has notice of C.U.P. hearing been sent to OhR Commissioner <br />(at least 10 days prior to hearing)! <br />V <br />IJo has r�^� <br />49.07 Subd, 4 IN <br />Outlines C.U.P. Review Process and Time Table, <br />N.fl. <br />49.07 Subd, 4 (c) <br />(1) (a) Does the application for conditional use permits <br />include the Information listed below as deemed <br />Li <br />�ina I <br />necessary by the Planning Commission for a determin- <br />Pro ca Ss <br />ation of the Regulatory Flood Protection -Elevation? <br />V.ra 1-1o..d bovrdq•4 <br />A plan (surface view) showing: <br />- elevations or contours of the ground, <br />- pertinent structure, fill or storage elevations, <br />- size, location, and special arrangement of all <br />proposed and existing structures on the site, <br />- location and elevations of streets, <br />- photographs showing existing lands uses and vegetation <br />upstream and downstream, <br />- soil type, <br />(2) Has one copy of the above been transmitted to an <br />engineer or other expert person or agency for technical <br />assistance in determl,nu ,The Regulatory Flood Protection <br />Elevations, <br />Have Minnesota Regulations IR 86-87 been not? <br />(3) Has the Planning Commission determined the Regulatory <br />Flood Protection Elevation at the site? <br />(� <br />