My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:02:11 AM
Creation date
3/17/2025 11:02:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/10/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'A- 4, s <br />MEMO TO: Mayor & Council <br />'ROht: Finance Director - Treasurer Brager <br />Clerk -Administrator Pauley i <br />DATE: <br />October 13, 1993 <br />SUBJECT: Purchasing Policy <br />During their last session the State Legislature raised the <br />limit on the requirements of advertising to solicit the <br />submission of sealed bids for purchases from $10,000 to $15,000. <br />We have revised section 2.01 of the City's purchasing policy <br />to reflect that change in state law. <br />We also took the opportunity to review all of the purchasing <br />Policy with department heads. Our review indicated that <br />section .1.121 "Issuance of Purchase Order Forms to Department <br />Heads", while performing its intended purpose of controlling <br />and recording purchases, was inadvertantly causing inefficien- <br />cies in City operations. Section 3.02 requires that prior <br />to the purchases of goods or services, which are estimated <br />to exceed $25.00, a purchase order be issued, signed by <br />a department head, and countersigned by either the Clerk <br />Administrator or Finance Director. On a weekly, and sometimes <br />daily basis, circumstances arise under which adherence to this <br />provision of the City's purchasing policy causes inefficiencies <br />in the City operation. <br />A few examples of what has actually occured in the past will <br />illustrate this point. The mechanic is working on the front <br />end loader. He determines that a hydraulic hose needs to <br />be replaced. From past experience the mechanic knows that <br />this hose costs approximately $65.00. The mechanic then contacts <br />the Public Works Foreman, informs him of the need for a <br />hydraulic hose, and requests the issuance of a purchase order. <br />Then the Public Works Foreman requests the issuance of a <br />purchase order from his department head, the Director of <br />Public Works/Community Development, who in turn, issues <br />a purchase order and requests it be countersigned by the <br />Clerk -Administrator or Finance Director. All that time and <br />effort to issue the purchase order was for an item that was <br />included in the City budget. <br />In the parks department the following occured. Several of <br />the maintenance men are taking down boards which have been <br />used for ballfield fencing and which will subsequenctly be used <br />hockeyfor <br />cracked or <br />brokenand need sto bevreplacederal of theWe have boardbeen einformed that <br />�—•., just one of these boards cost $23.00. Since several need <br />to be replaced purchasing policy requires a purchase order <br />be issued prior to their purchase. Thus, the procedure <br />previously outlined for the issuance of a purchase order <br />must be followed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.