My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/10/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/10/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:06:38 AM
Creation date
3/17/2025 11:06:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/24/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGSTED <br />INCORPORATED <br />PUBLIC FINANCE <br />ADVISORS <br />14 October 1983 <br />Mr, Donald F. Pauley, Administator <br />Mr. Donald Brager, Finance Director <br />City Hall <br />2401 Highway 10 <br />Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 <br />RE: Defeasonce of Improvement Bond Issues <br />We have prepared this study for your consideration as a proposal for doing the <br />defeasonce of the City's Improvement Bond Fund and also as a proposal to be <br />retained by the City to serve as its financial advisor. The study demonstrates a <br />Procedure for defeasonce of the five improvement bond issues which were sold <br />in the years 1965 through 1974 and are included in the common Improvement <br />Bond Fund. As a separate exhibit we have also shown the cash flow and cash <br />requirements for the 1981 Improvement Bond Fund, We have not attempted to <br />make any adjustments to the advance refunding bond issue of 1976. That bond <br />issue appears to be adequately supported and the interest rates on the <br />outstanding maturities are lower than rates which could be received today. The <br />bonds are subject to cull at any interest payment date end therefore if in the <br />future the cash flow is not adequate to meet the debt service payments, the <br />City could refund the outstanding bonds by simply calling them and issuing a <br />new bond issue more structured to the then current projected cash flow. We do <br />not anticipate any problems will arise with that issue. <br />In preparing our study we have relied heavily upon the City's 1982 audit and the <br />Special Assessment Debt Service Study,,, both prepared by DeLaHunt Veto & <br />Co. Ltd. for information relative to the special assessments and some cash <br />balances. Upon an actual defeasonce we would carefully verify again the <br />numbers to make sure that everything is properly structured. <br />The most significuit part of this study is the defeasance of the Improvement <br />Bond Fund. Schedules A-1 through A-5 are the semiannual debt service <br />requirements for each of the individual bond issues. They represent all <br />remaining debt service as of October I, 1983. Schedule A-6 is the combined <br />debt service schedule for the Improvement Bond Fund in its entirety. <br />Schedule B, pages I through 3 shows the defeasonce of the bond issues through <br />the purchase and cash flow of the securities to be acquired. We hasten to point <br />out that these are strictly estimates and are based upon prices determined frori; <br />the Friday, October 7 Wall Street Journal. We used a single source for pricing <br />which can be verified by the ity if you so desire to check the accuracy of our <br />` numbers. There are a total of 43 separate securities transactions involved and <br />therefore it is a very complicated process to determine the most efficient cash <br />flow for the required escrow account. We have also separated the securities <br />800 Osborn Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 (612) 222.4241 <br />250 North Sunnyslope Road, Brookfield, Wisconsin 53005 (414) 782-8212 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.