Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council p" " <br />Nor <br />Regular Meeting <br />--_____ i October 24, 1983 . <br />Page Two <br />report with his consultants Darr -------------------------------- Page <br />were in substantial agreement Ewithcerin and -_---- <br />asked that the Braun Engineering report be accepted <br />theirby the City so he could proceed with Phase I ce <br />their developmenL,of <br />Bruce hlalkerson, attorney for the Millers, asked <br />that by reference, everything that had been pre- <br />sented to the City to date regarding the Miller <br />property be incorporated into the record, including <br />all exhibits, correspondence, maps and so forth. <br />Director Johnson asked the Council to consider also <br />entering .into the records the letters received from <br />Tom Peterson of the Minnesota Soil and Water <br />Conservation District, dated October 19, 1983,and <br />the one from Dr. Russell Adams, from the Ramsey <br />Soil and Water Conservation District, dated October <br />20, 1983. <br />Attorney Meyers advised that the issue to be <br />dec kled during this hearing was to consider a <br />redelineation of wetlands on the Miller property. <br />Director Johnson made a presentation, using a map <br />Of the area, showing the different wetland boundaries <br />established by the Wetland <br />Ordinance and Darr and <br />Braun reports for <br />the area. <br />Mr. Malkerson asked that the future referenceked for <br />. The map be Council labeled rthe map <br />Public Hearing Exhibit 1, dated October 29, 19831 <br />which is a compilation, subject to refinement, <br />of the boundary delineations from discussi <br />the public hearing. ons in <br />Mr. Jim Miller presented the Council wir_r, <br />flch r�nr auclio,i of construction <br />County Highway Department Plans from the <br />area around 85th ' which shows the actual <br />the culvert that Avenue North, and the location of <br />placed on the property. <br />D"e=tar Johnson clbarified the <br />vert, stating that it had purpose of the cul- <br />and they had not been ableto installed flat, <br />in the field to locate the culvert <br />notin ' to see what condition it was in, <br />g that it was installed over 50 years ago. <br />Mr. Miller's map was labeled Public Hearing <br />Exhibit 2, with the notation that the culvert <br />had not been proven to be there. <br />Mr. Miller explained they have du they believe the culvert to be in g in the area e <br />ey have <br />found evidence of material that wohlocated <br />En the entrance to a ulddbeculvert. 110 added that Barr <br />Engineering had made notaLioils of I , elevations <br />