Laserfiche WebLink
November 111, 1983 <br />Mounds View City <br />Council Page Pour. <br />Regular. Meeting ------------------------------------------ <br />- <br />or lack thereof, and have expressed a desire to <br />pursue legal action,epocess��usednshouldshe lbelmoreat in <br />open <br />the future the zed. She added that although she <br />and fully analyzed. <br />has reservations in voting in favor aintedr a achief. <br />date, shq will support the newly fP <br />Motion/Second: Linke/11ankner to amend the previous <br />mot on an set guidelines for the appointment of <br />the Police Chief and havela pr bat alhl)nbo9inn mciof <br />1'L months, Frith reviews I <br />Ulu Loarth, sevcnCli, aucl tw�lth nl'th I) tIIC c un a <br />li, ut goals and policies ;eL ec�dalcsessio�n `onucil, <br />to be determined at the next agenda <br />i,oveanber - <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Councilmember Linke suggested fourinclpolicies that be <br />eels <br />be <br />ome <br />typeuofdcriteriaafor the police there <br />and stted he policeChiefl10tods <br />base his <br />accomplishments on. <br />iewed Chapter 419.05, which concerns <br />Mayor McCarty rev <br />the duties of the Civil Service Commission. <br />les of the <br />ivil <br />Attorney Meyers stated that the rurobationaryCperiod, <br />Service Commission provide for a plie <br />and read applicable sections of the code. theCivil <br />that the Council may, with the approval p, added <br />Service Commission, reject an appU�Ll c <br />the Council should be amaknd ingaevaluationsndidateiduring the <br />probationary period not <br />meeting with approval, they can certify it to the <br />int <br />Civil Service Commission. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he agreed to a P°revioushmotion, <br />Councilmember Linke s concept of the p <br />with that thels and Civil Servicesshould be Commission,ics he could <br />th0 set, in not <br />Council <br />cooperation <br />vote for a list of goals and policies that the Council <br />had not seen. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated she agreed, to a point, <br />with Councilmember Linke's motion, but that specific <br />guidelines should not be set out in a motion m. this <br />time, as the Council needs time to review them. <br />favor of <br />Councilmember liankoliciesstated <br />includedasasnthey need to <br />having goals and p <br />ro riate at this time, prior <br />set forth what the Council expects of the new Police <br />Chief, andit <br />ould be app <br />to taking position, so t e new Chief would know <br />what is expected of him. <br />Motion Carried <br />• <br />