My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1983/12/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Agenda Packets - 1983/12/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:38:22 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 11:31:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/8/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 14, 1983 <br />Itegular Meeting Page Nine <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />the process going, and then require the proof needed <br />before the second reading. <br />Couneilmember Doty replied they would be moving on <br />an ordinance change, and then pusuibly changing their <br />minds later, which could result in legal reprocussions. <br />Councilmember Linke pointed out the Council. has done <br />that several times in the past on other ordinances. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated she had voted in favor <br />of tabling action but reminded the Council they are <br />set to time limits. <br />rival vote on main motion as amended: <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion/Second: McCarty/Uoty to table this action, 10 <br />to coiiidilc with Item 9 on the agenda. <br />2 ayes 3 nays <br />Councilmembers Linke, Blanchard and Hankner voted <br />against the motion. <br />Tnt,n Millar aakpd Hint- H.he Council please move on <br />this item. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated it was clear in her <br />mind what boundaries should be set, and she did not <br />feel action should be delayed. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he felt the two ordinances <br />go hand in hand. <br />Councilmember Linke pointed ouc the Council had <br />originally requested that the two area, 1-22 and <br />1-23 be treated separately, and stated he concurs <br />with the Braun delineation. <br />Councilmember Doty stated there is nothing stating <br />specifically where the boundries should be, just <br />where they could be. <br />Director Johnson reviewed a map of the proposed <br />changes. }le stated that it would supercede any <br />i <br />previous documents in accuracy. <br />�- ...inci.lmemher Doty stated that Barr Engineering gave <br />the City a map of the wetland boundries that differs <br />somewhat from the Braun report, and the Council <br />Motion Carried <br />1st Reading of <br />Ord. No. 351 <br />Amending Chapter 98 <br />of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code <br />Entitled "Wetland <br />Zoning ordinance" <br />Motion Failed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.