Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 14, 1983 <br />Regular Meeting Page Twelve <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Councilmember Linke stated that several times during., ' <br />the prereeding discussion, the development has been <br />brought up, and pointed out that the ordinance does <br />not contemplate a development, but rather contemplates <br />an .amendment of the wetlands zoning ordinance and map <br />which has been shown in error. Ile added that <br />the City 'hired a consultant to give site specific <br />buuudaries, and that because of that inlurmation, the <br />ordinance was brought forth. He added he would prefer <br />to have the report of the eigineer hired by the City <br />used, and hu does noL want to make iL a practice of <br />contradictinq cngincers. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he is concerned with the preser- <br />vation of the integrity of the ordinance, and that <br />for 1-22, they asked for specific statements from <br />the consultant, which they did not receive. Ile added <br />that 1-22 and 1-23 go hand in hand. <br />Councilmember Doty stated that if a motion is made <br />this evening, there is a possibility the ordinance <br />would fail tonight also. <br />John Miller stated again that he would like to get on <br />with the process. 111 <br />Attorney Meyers advised that the first reading of <br />ordinance should have a 4/5 vote. <br />John Miller replied that that was a procedural <br />question, and he felt a majority was required for <br />the firs: reading. <br />Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to have -he first <br />rea ing o Ordinance No. 351, amending Chapter 48 <br />of the Mcunds View Municipal Code entitled "Wetland <br />Zoning Ordinance", anu waive the reading of the <br />ordinance, <br />Councilmember Linke pointed out that all the motion <br />was doing is accepting the delineation of Wetlands <br />1-23, the delineation as given by the engineer the <br />City hired to determine it. <br />Councilmember Doty stated the engineer came up with <br />the most liberal delineation, and there is some <br />question in taking the most liberal position on <br />the boundaries, and they could come up with some th <br />type of compromise. <br />Councilmember Hankner suggested looking at the Braun <br />