Laserfiche WebLink
�k <br />1` . •� <br />u Jd .j <br />December 12, 1983 <br />4 <br />Mounds View City Council V ._ _ i <br />Page Three <br />Regular Meeting, -------------------------- <br />----------------------------------- <br />on the property, and so forth, but showing <br />indicate a kitchen was planned. <br />j nothing that would <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she did not feel the <br />followed the <br />City was responsible, as they have <br />procedure as set forth. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he felt Mrs. Chaika may have <br />had communica- <br />been a victim of circumstance, and <br />but he stated <br />tion problems with her contractor, <br />Council had approved the request, it <br />that if the <br />be a violation of the code. Ile did recortmend <br />would <br />waiving the fees Mrs. Chaika had paid for the <br />rezoning. <br />Motioicond: McCarty/Dnry to waive the refund <br />the rezoning fees paid by Mrs. Chaika for the <br />Planning Commission hearing. <br />Motion Carried <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Councilmember Linke asked that Staff note :•iith this <br />were problems, and <br />particular contractor that there <br />it is time for him to renew <br />keep it in mind when <br />his license. <br />d the regular meeting and opened <br />Mayor McCarty closeof <br />6B' Public oHearing <br />the next public hearing at 7:52 PM. <br />Ordinance No. <br />There were no comments from anyone present. <br />352 <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the regular meeting at 7:52 PM. <br />Director Johnson presented an amendment to 40,04 <br />solar <br />Sub D(2), regarding the positioning of <br />Staff recommends it be <br />devices, and stated <br />added to the ordinance language. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he had spoken with the Chairman <br />of the Planning Commission and that there are some <br />issues before the Planning Commission at this time <br />that require changes to Chapter 40 as soon as possible. <br />He stated, however, that Roberts Rules allows only <br />two amendments to any ordinance, and that in reviewing <br />the proposed ordinance, he came up with over 48 changes <br />to be made. He reviewed some of those changes with <br />the Council and questioned how some of the criteria <br />was established. <br />Director Johnson explained that areas were in the code <br />in <br />oriinallyre ot he view, draftedand <br />inhe <br />1974. <br />