My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/01/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/01/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:04:43 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:04:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
1/23/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-,3 <br />TO: Mayor & City Council <br />i <br />FROM: Clerk-Administrdt� <br />DATE: January 30, 1984 <br />SUBJECT: Special Projects Fund <br />As a result of the discussion centering around the repealer <br />clause of ordiance No. 356 establishing the Special Projects <br />Fund, staff would like to respond to the concerns voiced by <br />Councilmember Doty. As we understand it, Councilmember Doty <br />voiced concerns about the following two basis issues, <br />1. The current repealer clause provides for all re- <br />maining funds to be deposited in the General Fund <br />which Councilmember Doty feels releases the Council <br />in office at that time from determining how the <br />funds would be specifically used. <br />2. It is Councilmember Doty's desire that the funds <br />resulting from the dafeasance of the Improvements <br />Bond Redemption Fund be returned to the taxpayers <br />of Mounds View from which a portion of the funds <br />came due to the special tax levy. <br />It is staff's thoughts that the deposit of these funds in the <br />General Fund is consistent with Mr. Doty's desires that the <br />dcfeas,ncr monies be returned to the taxpayers as the General <br />Fund is by intent designed to fund those services which directly <br />or indirectly benefit all of the communities residents. Other <br />funds cannot necessarily be said to do the same. <br />We agree that the Council repealing the enabling ordinance i:oY <br />the Special Projects Fund should be required to stipulate how the <br />funds would be used. we feel that this can best be accomplished <br />by requiring that when that Council repeals the Ordinance, the <br />remaining funds be deposited in the General Fund with the <br />resolution specifying the purposes for which the funds would be <br />expended. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that the Council amend <br />Ordinance No. 356 by adding the following to the last sentence <br />in Section 27.05; "...with the resolution authorizing repeal <br />specifying the purpose(s) for which the funds would be expended." <br />DP/mb <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.