Agenda Packets - 1984/03/26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e. n_.__. Mounds View City Council U1 `J� March 12, 1984 Regular Meeting - Page Eight ------------------------------------------------------------------------� Councilmember Linke pointed out that earlier in the year the Council authorized Attorney Meyers to go ahead at any time he feels the lawsuit should be implemented, and that Attorney Meyers has stated he would like to have the consultant study in hand and preliminary work done before returning to court. He stated he has not had an opportunity to review the consultant proposal. Councilmember Hankner stated she also was not given anything to 'review from the consultant who has expressed interest in working for the City. She also pointed out that according to the agenda, the topic for this evening was a discussion of the Anoka County -Blaine Airport improvements, not whether to proceed with legal action. Councilmember Blanchard stated that since site did not make a statement during the lengthy debate, she would like to preface her vote by saying that because this motion only reaffirms what the Council did previously, she would vote yes. Director Thatcher reported bids had been opened earlier 8. Consideratis in the day for the servicing of Well No. 2, and re- of Bids for the viewed the bids received and recommended it be awarded Servicing of to the lower bidder, E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc., in the Well No. 2 amount of $11,342. He advised he has done business with them before and feels they are a reputable firm. Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to approve the award to E. H. Renner and Sons, Inc., in the amount of $11,342 for Well No. 2 maintenance. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Thatcher reported that new developments 9. Consideration of have come up regarding the storm water drainage Staff Memo capabilities. The major issue at the Planning Regarding Commission meeting was the size of the storm Christopher water retention basin, and that in speaking with Companies John Johnson today, the size required was deter- Development mined to be 7/10ths of an acre, and the developer Proposal is proposing a 3.3 acre retention basin, which is four times the required size. He pointed out this would go a long way toward solving the problems of storm water drainage in that area of the City.