My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1984/03/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Agenda Packets - 1984/03/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:58:05 PM
Creation date
3/17/2025 2:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/26/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
March 12, <br />1989. <br />Mounds view City Council page Six <br />Regular Meeting <br />-------------------------------------------------- <br />tinassess <br />Representative Knuth also advised the Council <br />in p <br />the value of the McCarron legislation <br />the value of its removal, <br />tionship to the lawsuit alacerela- <br />nd <br />the Council can point to that is <br />as if there is no law <br />they would not have a strong stand. <br />in direct violation, <br />Mayor McCarty stated the City cannot delay any longer, <br />if the City does not <br />and allow MAC to expend funds, and <br />delaying question from the courts. <br />move, they will face a <br />asking for an EIS. He also expressed <br />the National <br />He recommended <br />his concern with an MLS, as it would allow <br />explained he had applied <br />Guard at the airport. He also <br />the Metropolitan Council Task Force <br />for membership on <br />and been told not to bother. <br />look atany <br />them toCity <br />Representative htutake,.andgain cautioned <br />a <br />action they <br />would insure several fallback <br />law <br />progressive lawsuit, which <br />options. <br />he plan <br />Councilmember Hanknerheecouncile6 8followeeks wing tago, and f <br />or <br />action agreed on by et their evidence <br />to g <br />reminded the Council they need <br />together before proceeding. <br />Bob Beutel responded to comments by Mayor McCarty <br />lie explained he supported <br />and actions he has taken. <br />the least possible damaas ge the <br />alternate C as being in <br />live with. ained hinhworking <br />City could <br />hundreds of hours and personalmoneysuggest the MLS <br />he did Bugg <br />on the airport issue. He stated <br />out the FAA has had somuch <br />be installed, and pointed would <br />MLS standards that MLS epmen <br />least <br />trouble adopting at <br />not be available to the Anoka County Airport <br />preference <br />foranother <br />his <br />decade. He stated that personal <br />would be for an ILS. <br />Mr. Beutel asked that everyone hang together in fighting <br />if the City does every - <br />for this cause, but advised that <br />they would be shot out of the water, <br />thing now, he expects <br />timing is Hrecommended <br />as the also informed1theeCouncil <br />and getting the guns loaded. He <br />is/St- Paul <br />that the noise level at the Minneapoleverna- <br />be at its greatest level <br />tional Airport will soon <br />and the move of the Air National <br />due to construction <br />Guard to the airport, so he advised laying low and <br />of the Leg islative <br />staying out of court until the end <br />out the next Task Force <br />et meeting <br />Session. He also pointed to <br />held in this area, which would be qo <br />will be to question <br />make a presentation, as well as a time <br />intermediate airport. <br />whether there is a need for a second <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.