Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council ' <br />April 9, 1984 <br />Page Ten <br />R.e.pular Meeting B, <br />---------------------------------------------------- <br />Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to authorize Staff <br />11, Considerar' <br />Formatior <br />topublish the notice to the residents that a <br />Task Forc, <br />Task Force is being formed, with appointments to <br />Council, with <br />Consider City <br />the Task Force to be by the <br />recommendation expected back by September 1, 1984. <br />Council and <br />a <br />The purpose of the Task Force will be to research <br />to the City <br />ission <br />Compensation <br />the current level of compensation paid <br />Council and proposed compensation for commissions <br />and committees. <br />Motion Carried <br />4 ayes 1 nay <br />Mayor McCarty stated he voted against the motion as <br />he feels the $200 per month compensation he receives <br />as a Councilmember is sufficient to cover his <br />expenses, but he is concerned, however, with the <br />time commission and committee members put in, <br />without receiving compensation. <br />Councilmember Hankner explained the intent of the <br />Task Force is to research all bodies in the City <br />and make their recommendations, and that did not <br />necessarily mean a raise for the Council. <br />Director Thatcher <br />reported <br />the quality of drinking <br />months, <br />12. Report of, <br />Director <br />water in the City <br />found <br />has been <br />to be <br />tested every six <br />acceptable. He reported <br />Public WoL / <br />and it has been <br />they will continue <br />testing <br />on the six month schedule, <br />Community Dvlp <br />but will not have <br />to test all <br />six wells every six <br />months. <br />Director Thatcher recommended to the Council the <br />hiring of an individual to work as an independent <br />contractor for the City for the MSA street project <br />for 1984. He explained the individual he would <br />recommend would like to work for the City as a <br />temporary employee, rather than an independent <br />contractor, and he would be willing to work at <br />$9/hour as a temporary employee, versus $11/hour <br />as an independent contractor. <br />Attorney Meyers explained that an independent <br />contractor would be responsible for his own workers <br />compensation and insurance, and the City would not <br />be responsible for unemploymemt, negligent acts and <br />so forth, whereas as a temporary employee, he would <br />take on those attributes. He added, however, that <br />even though the individual may be called an inde- <br />pendent contractor, he may legally be deemed an <br />employee, 1 <br />